Wednesday, 28 September 2022

The Climate Change Clock

 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to navigationJump to search
Metronome in November 2020, after the original clock was replaced with the Climate Clock

The Climate Clock is a graphic to demonstrate how quickly the planet is approaching 1.5 °C of global warming, given current emissions trends.[1] It also shows the amount of CO2 already emitted, and the global warming to date.

The Climate Clock was launched in 2015 to provide a measuring stick against which viewers can track climate change mitigation progress. The date shown when humanity reaches 1.5°C will move closer as emissions rise, and further away as emissions decrease. The clock is updated every year to reflect the latest global CO2 emissions trend and rate of climate warming.[1] As of June 2022, the clock counts down towards late July 2029. On September 20, 2021, the clock was delayed to July 28, 2028, likely because of the COP26 Conference and the land protection by indigneous peoples.

The clock is hosted by Human Impact Lab, itself part of Concordia University.[2][3] Organisations supporting the climate clock include Concordia University, the David Suzuki FoundationFuture Earth, and the Climate Reality Project.

There are 6 years, 42 weeks, 4 days, 2 hours, 43 minutes and 59 seconds until the Climate Clock reaches zero (approximate). (refresh)

Relevance[edit]

1.5 °C is an important threshold for many climate impacts, as shown by the Special Report on Global Warming of 1.5 °C. Every increment to global temperature is expected to increase weather extremes, such as heat waves and extreme precipitation events. There is also the risk of irreversible ice sheet loss. Consequent sea level rise also increases sharply between 1.5 °C and 2 °C, and virtually all corals could be wiped out at 2 °C warming.[1]

The New York Climate Clock[edit]

In late September 2020, artists and activists, Gan Golan, Katie Peyton Hofstadter, Adrian Carpenter and Andrew Boyd repurposed the Metronome in Union Square in New York City to show the Climate Clock.[4][5] The goal was to "remind the world every day just how perilously close we are to the brink." This is in juxtaposition to the Doomsday Clock, which measures a variety of factors that could lead to "destroying the world" using "dangerous technologies of our making,"[6] with climate change being one of the smaller factors. This specific installation is expected to be one of many in cities around the world.[7] At the time of installation, the clock read 7 years and 102 days. Greta Thunberg, Swedish environmental activist, was involved in the project early on, and reportedly received a hand-held version of the climate clock.[7]

Since its inception, the New York Climate Clock has added a second set of numbers for the percentage of the world's energy use that comes from renewable energy sources.[8]

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. Jump up to:a b c "The Climate Clock: counting down to 1,5°C"Archived from the original on 2020-01-30. Retrieved 2020-01-30.
  2. ^ "About David Usher"Archived from the original on 2020-01-30. Retrieved 2020-01-30.
  3. ^ "Concordia University Human Impact Lab: Climate Clock project"Archived from the original on 2020-01-30. Retrieved 2020-01-30.
  4. ^ Moynihan, Colin (2020-09-20). "A New York Clock That Told Time Now Tells the Time Remaining"The New York TimesISSN 0362-4331Archived from the original on 2020-11-16. Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  5. ^ "The Climate Clock"ClimateClock.WorldArchived from the original on 2021-06-05. Retrieved 2021-06-03.
  6. ^ Cowan, Jill (2020-02-06). "Tick, Tick, Tick. Why the Doomsday Clock Is Moving Closer to Midnight"The New York TimesISSN 0362-4331Archived from the original on 2020-11-14. Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  7. Jump up to:a b "'Climate Clock' Unveiled in New York City"Earth.Org - Past | Present | Future. 2020-09-21. Archived from the original on 2021-11-22. Retrieved 2020-11-15.
  8. ^ Moynihan, Colin (2021-04-19). "The Climate Clock Now Ticks With a Tinge of Optimism"The New York TimesISSN 0362-4331Archived from the original on 2021-06-03. Retrieved 2021-06-03.

External links[edit]

Friday, 16 September 2022

King Charles III wants to continue with Climate Change Crusade..

 



Will King Charles III turn his back on a lifetime of environmental campaigning?

By Justin Rowlatt
Climate editor

  • Published

As Prince of Wales he spent decades campaigning, cajoling, and convening meetings to drive action on environmental issues.

As king he is subject to different rules - the monarch is obliged to remain politically neutral.

But his friends and advisers say he will not cool on the issue of global warming.

Might urging action on key global issues like climate change or biodiversity loss be part of what a modern monarchy looks like?

King Charles' interests have ranged from tropical forests to the ocean depths, from sustainable farming practices to water security. They began long before such concerns became mainstream.

Within months of his investiture as Prince of Wales in 1969, the 20-year-old Prince Charles wrote to Prime Minister Harold Wilson worried about the decline of salmon stocks in Scottish rivers. "People are notoriously short-sighted when it comes to questions of wildlife," he complained.

Increasingly he has focused on tackling global warming, which he regards as one of the greatest challenges humanity has ever faced. He was a major presence at the COP26 global climate summit in Glasgow last year, urging world leaders to work together to save the planet during a speech at the opening ceremony.

When I interviewed him ahead of COP26 he told me "It has taken far too long" for the world to respond to the risks of climate change. I pointed out world leaders would soon be gathering to talk about the climate crisis, he responded: "But they just talk, the problem is to get action."


He even said he understood why some people felt motivated to take to the streets with organisations like Extinction Rebellion, noting "people should really notice how despairing so many young people are".

As for the risk of not taking action, he was very clear: "It will be a disaster. It will be catastrophic. It is already beginning to be catastrophic because nothing in nature can survive the stress that is created by these extremes of weather."

The veteran green campaigner Tony Juniper rates the new king as "possibly the most significant environmental figure of all time". Chairman of Natural England and a long-term adviser to Charles, Mr Juniper has spoken of the "incredible depth" of his knowledge and the "absolutely enormous" impact he has had.

The question is whether as king, Charles, will be so outspoken on this or any other issue.

"Everything we know about how he has thought about his accession, tells us he will be absolutely clear about his constitutional duties," says Jonathan Porritt, former head of Friends of the Earth and an ex-adviser to the new king.

King Charles has said as much himself. When asked in an interview in 2018 whether he would be a "meddling" king he replied "I am not that stupid" and referred to suggestions he would continue to lobby parliamentarians as "nonsense".


Connector of people

When I asked him last year whether he thought the government of then Prime Minister Boris Johnson was doing enough to tackle the climate issue, he laughed. "I couldn't possibly comment."

And, last week, the new king acknowledged it would "not be possible for me to give as much of my time and energies to the charities and issues for which I care so deeply".

But his passion for environmental issues will not suddenly evaporate. Much of his work had already taken place away from the glare of publicity.

"The King is a convener, connecting people and organisations in ways that open up possibilities and create solutions," says his former press secretary, Julian Payne. Charles would invite "the best brains and the most experienced people and listen to their ideas and advice".

"I suspect it is a modus operandi that will continue as he takes on this new role," says Mr Payne..

Charles's approach to problem-solving has led to some unexpected initiatives. Look how he worked to engage the accountancy profession in tackling climate change, says Mr Porritt.

He recognised the world would need ways of calculating emissions and judging the progress of companies, says Mr Porritt. And, in 2004, he set up the Accounting for Sustainability Project, to attempt to begin to work out how that might be done.


Terra Carta pledges

In recent years he has worked to encourage the business community to help lead action on climate change. More than 500 chief executives - including the heads of some of the biggest financial institutions and businesses in the world - are now part of his Sustainable Markets Initiative.

They are described as a as a "coalition of the willing" and have signed up to his "Terra Carta" pledges, agreeing to "rapidly accelerate the transition towards a sustainable future".

"We need a vast military-style campaign to marshal the strength of the global private sector," Charles said when he opened COP26.

One senior British politician told me he could imagine Charles making a similar speech as king. "You won't hear him expressing a view on fracking," he said, "but I can imagine him making a speech on the need to take more urgent action on climate."


US President Joe Biden's climate envoy, John Kerry, agrees. He has said he hopes Charles will continue to press for action on climate.

"It is a universal issue, it is not ideology," Mr Kerry told the BBC Radio 4 Today programme, "It's about the survival of the planet. I can't imagine him not wanting to [press for action on climate] and feeling compelled to use the important role as the monarch and urge the world to do the things the world needs to do."

Tackling climate change is, after all, an obligation on governments that is enshrined in UK law.

The Climate Change Act requires the government reduce greenhouse gas emissions to net zero by 2050.

All the main parties agree it is an important priority. Prime Minister Liz Truss has already said her government will "double down" on reaching the target.

So, here's a question King Charles III will have already considered: how controversial is it for a British monarch to express general support for something that is already enshrined in law.





Google listing on articles on Charles and climate change


Transfinancial Economics could well be the key towards real change...



Tuesday, 13 September 2022

Price Controls

 From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Transfinancial Economics uses a far more advanced form of what are called digital (super flexible) price controls which allows market price to rise naturally. They are in stark controls to the old manual controls of the past and represent a vital revolution in economics. See https://wiki.p2pfoundation.net/Transfinancial_Economics  


Jump to navigationJump to search
World War I poster of the United States Food Administration

Price controls are restrictions set in place and enforced by governments, on the prices that can be charged for goods and services in a market. The intent behind implementing such controls can stem from the desire to maintain affordability of goods even during shortages, and to slow inflation, or, alternatively, to ensure a minimum income for providers of certain goods or to try to achieve a living wage. There are two primary forms of price control: a price ceiling, the maximum price that can be charged; and a price floor, the minimum price that can be charged. A well-known example of a price ceiling is rent control, which limits the increases that a landlord is permitted by government to charge for rent. A widely used price floor is minimum wage (wages are the price of labor). Historically, price controls have often been imposed as part of a larger incomes policy package also employing wage controls and other regulatory elements.

Although price controls are routinely used by governments, Western economists generally agree that price controls do not accomplish what they intend to, and many economists instead recommend such controls should be avoided.[1] For example, nearly three-quarters of a sample of 1,350 U.S. economists surveyed in the early 1990s disagreed with the statement, "Wage-price controls are a useful policy option in the control of inflation."[2]

History[edit]

A World War II-era shop display promoting price controls.
World War II poster about US price controls

The Roman Emperor Diocletian tried to set maximum prices for all commodities in the late 3rd century AD but with little success. In the early 14th century, the Delhi Sultanate ruler Alauddin Khalji instituted several market reforms, which included price-fixing for a wide range of goods, including grains, cloth, slaves and animals. However, a few months after his death, these measures were revoked by his son Qutbuddin Mubarak Shah.[3] During the French Revolutionthe Law of the Maximum set price limits on the sale of food and other staples.

Governments in planned economies typically control prices on most or all goods but have not sustained high economic performance and have been almost entirely replaced by mixed economies. Price controls have also been used in modern times in less-planned economies, such as rent control.[1] During World War I, the United States Food Administration enforced price controls on food.[4][5][6][7] Price controls were also imposed in the US and Nazi Germany during World War II.[8][9]

Postwar[edit]

Wage controls have been tried in many countries to reduce inflation, seldom successfully. Modern neoclassical economic theory supports the alternative remedy of reducing the money supply and proposes that monetary inflation is caused by too much money creation by the central bank.[citation needed]

United Kingdom[edit]

The National Board for Prices and Incomes was created by the government of Harold Wilson in 1965 in an attempt to solve the problem of inflation in the British economy by managing wages and prices. The Prices and Incomes Act 1966 c. 33 affected UK labour law, regarding wage levels and price policies. It allowed the government to begin a process to scrutinise rising levels of wages (then around 8% per year) by initiating reports and inquiries and ultimately giving orders for a standstill. The objective was to control inflation. It proved unpopular after the 1960s.

United States[edit]

In the United States, price controls have been enacted several times. The first time price controls were enacted nationally was in 1906 as a part of the Hepburn Act.[10] In World War I the War Industries Board was established to set priorities, fix prices, and standardize products to support the war efforts of the United States. During the 1930s, the National Industrial Recovery Act (NIRA) created the National Recovery Administration, that set prices and created codes of "fair practices". In May 1935, the Supreme Court held that the mandatory codes section of NIRA were unconstitutional, in the court case of Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States.

In 1971, President Richard Nixon issued Executive Order 11615 (pursuant to the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970), imposing a 90-day freeze on wages and prices. The constitutionality of this action was challenged and upheld in the case of Amalgamated Meat Cutters v. Connally337 F. Supp. 737 (D.D.C. 1971).

The individual states have sometimes chosen to implement their own control policies. In the 1860s, several midwestern states of the United States, namely Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, and Illinois, enacted a series of laws called the Granger Laws, primarily to regulate rising fare prices of railroad and grain elevator companies.

California controls the prices of electricity within the state, which conservative economist Thomas Sowell blames for the occasional electricity shortages the state experiences.[11] Sowell said in 2001, "Since the utility companies have been paying more for electricity than they were allowed to charge their customers, they were operating in the red and the financial markets are downgrading their bonds."[11] California's price-setting board agreed to raise rates but not as much as the companies were paying on the wholesale market for their electricity.[12] Economist Lawrence Makovich contended, "We've already seen in California that price caps on retail rates increased demand and made the shortage worse and price caps also forced the largest utility, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, into bankruptcy in four months."[13] While some charged that electricity providers had in past years charged above-market rates,[13] in 2002 the San Francisco Chronicle reported that before the blackouts, many energy providers left the state because they could make a greater profit in other Western states.[14] The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission stepped in and set price caps for each megawatt of power bought after lifting the caps to avoid rolling blackouts six months previously.[14]

The state of Hawaii briefly introduced a cap on the wholesale price of gasoline (the Gas Cap Law) in an effort to fight "price gouging" in that state in 2005. Because it was widely seen as too soft and ineffective, it was repealed shortly thereafter.[15]

Venezuela[edit]

According to Girish Gupta from The Guardian, price controls have created a scarcity of basic goods and made black markets flourish under President Maduro.[16]

India[edit]

In India, the government first enacted price control in 2013 for the Drug Price Control order. This order gave local regulatory body, and the Pharmaceutical Pricing Authority the power to set ceiling prices on the National List of Essential medicines.[17]

Sri Lanka[edit]

In 2021 the Sri Lankan government enacted price controls on several essential items resulting in shortages.[18][19]

Price floor[edit]

Protesters call for an increased legal minimum wage as part of the "Fight for $15" effort to require a $15 per hour minimum wage in 2015. A government-set minimum wage is a price floor on the price of labour.

A price floor is a government- or group-imposed price control or limit on how low a price can be charged for a product,[20] good, commodity, or service. A price floor must be higher than the equilibrium price in order to be effective. The equilibrium price, commonly called the "market price", is the price where economic forces such as supply and demand are balanced and in the absence of external influences the (equilibrium) values of economic variables will not change, often described as the point at which quantity demanded and quantity supplied are equal (in a perfectly competitive market). Governments use price floors to keep certain prices from going too low.

Two common price floors are minimum wage laws and supply management in Canadian agriculture. Other price floors include regulated US airfares prior to 1978 and minimum price per-drink laws for alcohol.

Advantages of a price floor are:

  • Motivates producers to produce more.
  • Prevents the fluctuation of prices of agricultural products.
  • Reduces the over-exploitation of producers.

Disadvantages of a price are:

  • Supply will exceed demand.
  • Resources are wasted.
  • The government may be forced to buy the excess supply or it may be discarded (e.g., in an agricultural context).

Price ceiling[edit]

A related government intervention to price floor, which is also a price control, is the price ceiling; it sets the maximum price that can legally be charged for a good or service, with a common example being rent control.

A price ceiling is a price control, or limit, on how high a price is charged for a product, commodity, or service. Governments use price ceilings to protect consumers from conditions that could make commodities prohibitively expensive. Such conditions can occur during periods of high inflation, in the event of an investment bubble, or in the event of monopoly ownership of a product, all of which can cause problems if imposed for a long period without controlled rationing, leading to shortages.[21] Further problems can occur if a government sets unrealistic price ceilings, causing business failures, stock crashes, or even economic crises. In fully unregulated market economies, price ceilings do not exist.

While price ceilings are often imposed by governments, there are also price ceilings that are implemented by non-governmental organizations such as companies, such as the practice of resale price maintenance. With resale price maintenance, a manufacturer and its distributors agree that the distributors will sell the manufacturer's product at certain prices (resale price maintenance), at or below a price ceiling (maximum resale price maintenance) or at or above a price floor.

Criticism[edit]

The primary criticism leveled against the price ceiling type of price controls is that by keeping prices artificially low, demand is increased to the point where supply cannot keep up, leading to shortages in the price-controlled product.[22] For example, Lactantius wrote that Diocletian "by various taxes, he had made all things exceedingly expensive, attempted by a law to limit their prices. Then much blood [of merchants] was shed for trifles, men were afraid to offer anything for sale, and the scarcity became more excessive and grievous than ever. Until, in the end, the [price limit] law, after having proved destructive to many people, was from mere necessity abolished."[23]

As with Diocletian's Edict on Maximum Prices, shortages lead to black markets where prices for the same good exceed those of an uncontrolled market.[22] Furthermore, once controls are removed, prices will immediately increase, which can temporarily shock the economic system.[22] Black markets flourish in most countries during wartime. States that are engaged in total war or other large-scale, extended wars often impose restrictions on home use of critical resources that are needed for the war effort, such as foodgasolinerubbermetal, etc., typically through rationing. In most cases, a black market develops to supply rationed goods at exorbitant prices. The rationing and price controls enforced in many countries during World War II encouraged widespread black market activity.[24] One source of black-market meat under wartime rationing was by farmers declaring fewer domestic animal births to the Ministry of Food than actually happened. Another in Britain was supplies from the US, intended only for use in US army bases on British land, but leaked into the local native British black market.

A classic example of how price controls cause shortages was during the Arab oil embargo between October 19, 1973, and March 17, 1974. Long lines of cars and trucks quickly appeared at retail gas stations in the U.S. and some stations closed because of a shortage of fuel at the low price set by the U.S. Cost of Living Council. The fixed price was below what the market would otherwise bear and, as a result, the inventory disappeared. It made no difference whether prices were voluntarily or involuntarily posted below the market clearing price. Scarcity resulted in either case. Price controls fail to achieve their proximate aim, which is to reduce prices paid by retail consumers, but such controls do manage to reduce supply.[25][26]

Nobel Memorial Prize winner Milton Friedman said, "We economists don't know much, but we do know how to create a shortage. If you want to create a shortage of tomatoes, for example, just pass a law that retailers can't sell tomatoes for more than two cents per pound. Instantly you'll have a tomato shortage. It's the same with oil or gas."[27]

U.S. President Richard Nixon's Secretary of the TreasuryGeorge Shultz, enacting Nixon's "New Economic Policy", lifted price controls that had begun in 1971 (part of the Nixon Shock). This lifting of price controls resulted in a rapid increase in prices. Price freezes were re-established five months later.[28] Stagflation was eventually ended in the United States when the Federal Reserve under chairman Paul Volcker raised interest rates to unusually high levels. This successfully ended high inflation but caused a recession that ended in the early 1980s.

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. Jump up to:a b Rockoff, Hugh (2008). "Price Controls". In David R. Henderson (ed.). The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics(2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Library of Economics and LibertyISBN 978-0865976658OCLC 237794267.
  2. ^ Alston, Richard M.; Kearl, J. R.; Vaughan, Michael B. (May 1992). "Is There a Consensus Among Economists in the 1990s?" (PDF)82 (2). American Economic Review: 203–209. Retrieved October 17, 2015.
  3. ^ Banarsi Prasad Saksena (1992) [1970]. "The Khaljis: Alauddin Khalji". In Mohammad Habib and Khaliq Ahmad Nizami (ed.). A Comprehensive History of India: The Delhi Sultanat (A.D. 1206–1526). Vol. 5 (Second ed.). The Indian History Congress / People's Publishing House. p. 429. OCLC 31870180.
  4. ^ "File: "Prices charged in this store will not exceed those indicated in the most recent list of Fair Prices applicable to this – NARA – 512556.jpg – Wikimedia Commons". Retrieved 2012-01-21.
  5. ^ "File: "Closed. Public Notice. For Violation of the rules of the United States Food Administration This Place is Closed days... – NARA – 512564.tif – Wikimedia Commons". Retrieved 2012-01-21.
  6. ^ "File: "This Store sells at FAIR PRICES as interpreted by U.S. Food Administration...", ca. 1917 – ca. 1919 – NARA – 512714.tif – Wikimedia Commons". Retrieved 2012-01-21.
  7. ^ "File: "We violated the regulations of the Food Administration but have pledged Full Obedience in the Future.", ca. 1917 – ca. – NARA – 512528.jpg – Wikimedia Commons". Retrieved 2012-01-21.
  8. ^ Paths to Democracy: Revolution and Totalitarianism By Rosemary H. T. O'Kane page 135
  9. ^ "File: "Cost of Living 1918–1944" – NARA – 514088.jpg – Wikimedia Commons". Retrieved 2012-01-21.
  10. ^ Theodore the Great: Conservative Crusader, p. 92
  11. Jump up to:a b Sowell, Thomas (2001-01-11). "The Cause of the California Electricity Shortages: "Price Controls""Capitalism Magazine. Archived from the original on 2013-05-30. Retrieved 2008-11-03.
  12. ^ "Power problems"NewsHour with Jim LehrerPBS. 2001-01-04. Retrieved 2008-11-06.
  13. Jump up to:a b "Power struggle"NewsHour with Jim Lehrer. PBS. 2001-06-20. Retrieved 2008-11-06.
  14. Jump up to:a b Martin, Mark (2002-05-10). "Memos show makings of power crisis"San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 2008-11-06.
  15. ^ the well of natal
  16. ^ Girish Gupta (16 April 2015). "Price controls and scarcity force Venezuelans to turn to the black market for milk and toilet paper"The Guardian.
  17. ^ "Indian government releases DPCO 2013, expanding price controls to 652 drugs"ihsmarkit.com. Retrieved 2020-04-12.
  18. ^ "Sri Lanka declares food emergency as forex crisis worsens"Al Jazeera. Retrieved 2022-02-17.
  19. ^ "Sri Lanka allows sharp rise in food prices to ease shortages"Al Jazeera. Retrieved 2022-02-17.
  20. ^ "Price floor – Definitions from Dictionary.com". dictionary.reference.com. Retrieved 2008-05-02.
  21. ^ Gregory, Mankiw, N. (2016-12-05). Principles of macroeconomics (Eighth ed.). Australia. ISBN 978-1305971509OCLC 953710348.
  22. Jump up to:a b c Walter J. Wessels, Economics (2000), pp. 232–33.
  23. ^ Lactantius"CHAP. VII."On the Deaths of the Persecutorsca. 300 (Christian Classics Ethereal Library ed.). Calvin College.
  24. ^ The Home Front (facsimile ed.). London: Imperial War Museum. July 1945. ISBN 978-1904897118.
  25. ^ Taylor and Van Doren, pp. 26–28
  26. ^ Thomas Sowell, Applied Economics: Thinking Beyond Stage One (2008), pp. 7–9, 112–113, ISBN 0465003451
  27. ^ "Controls blamed for U.S. energy woes", Los Angeles Times, February 13, 1977, Milton Friedman press conference in Los Angeles.
  28. ^ "George P. Shultz (1972–1974)". Treasury.gov. 2010-11-20. Retrieved 2013-09-27.

Further reading[edit]

External links[edit]