|Blogger Reference Link http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Transfinancial_Economics|
Article Ref Wikipedia.
This article may be too long to read and navigate comfortably. (October 2013)
Food security refers to the availability of food and one's access to it. A household is considered food-secure when its occupants do not live in hunger or fear of starvation. The USDA estimates that nearly 9 out of 10 U.S households were food secure throughout 2005. It is a measure of resilience to future disruption or unavailability of critical food supply due to various risk factors including droughts, shipping disruptions, fuel shortages, economic instability, wars, etc.
The UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food understands that food security challenges require a multidimensional approach The framework advanced by Olivier De Schutter provides a coherent entry point for the assessment of food security and insecurity. This approach emphasizes the physical availability of food; the social,economic and physical access people have to food; and the nutrition, safety and cultural appropriateness or adequacy of food.
According to the World Resources Institute, global per capita food production has been increasing substantially for the past several decades. In India, the second-most populous country in the world, 30 million people have been added to the ranks of the hungry since the mid-1990s and 46% of children are underweight.
Worldwide, around 925 million people are chronically hungry due to extreme poverty, while up to 2 billion people lack food security intermittently due to varying degrees of poverty (source: FAO, 2010). According to the International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development, failed agriculture market regulation and the lack of anti-dumping mechanisms engenders much of the world's food scarcity and malnutrition. As of late 2007, export restrictions and panic buying, US Dollar Depreciation, increased farming for use in biofuels, world oil prices at more than $100 a barrel, global population growth, climate change, loss of agricultural land to residential and industrial development, and growing consumer demand in China and India are claimed to have pushed up the price of grain. However, the role of some of these factors is under debate. Some argue the role of biofuel has been overplayed as grain prices have come down to the levels of 2006. Nonetheless, food riots have recently taken place in many countries across the world.
The ongoing global credit crisis has affected farm credits, despite a boom in commodity prices. Food security is a complex topic, standing at the intersection of many disciplines.
A new peer-reviewed journal of Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food began publishing in 2009. In developing countries, often 70% or more of the population lives in rural areas. In that context, agricultural development among smallholder farmers and landless people provides a livelihood for people allowing them the opportunity to stay in their communities. In many areas of the world, land ownership is not available, thus, people who want or need to farm to make a living have little incentive to improve the land.
In the US, there are approximately 2,000,000 farmers, less than 1% of the population. A direct relationship exists between food consumption levels and poverty. Families with the financial resources to escape extreme poverty rarely suffer from chronic hunger, while poor families not only suffer the most from chronic hunger, but are also the segment of the population most at risk during food shortages and famines.
Two commonly used definitions of food security come from the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA):
- Food security exists when all people, at all times, have physical, social and economic access to sufficient, safe and nutritious food to meet their dietary needs and food preferences for an active and healthy life.
- Food security for a household means access by all members at all times to enough food for an active, healthy life. Food security includes at a minimum (1) the ready availability of nutritionally adequate and safe foods, and (2) an assured ability to acquire acceptable foods in socially acceptable ways (that is, without resorting to emergency food supplies, scavenging, stealing, or other coping strategies). (USDA)
- 1 Measurement
- 2 Pillars of food security
- 3 World Summit on Food Security
- 4 Effects of food insecurity
- 5 Challenges to achieving food security
- 6 Risks to food security
- 7 Children and food security
- 8 Gender and food security
- 8.1 Barriers to gendered food security
- 8.2 Gender and global food security policy
- 9 Approaches
- 10 See also
- 11 References
- 12 Sources
- 13 Further reading
- 14 External links
MeasurementFood security indicators and measures have evolved over time from derived measures, which explores country level household income and expenditure surveys to estimate per capita caloric availability towards fundamental measures, which capture the subjective nature of inadequate access. In general the objective of food security indicators and measures is to capture some or all of the main components of food security in terms of food availability, access and utilization or adequacy. While availability (production and supply) and utilization/adequacy (nutritional status/anthropometric measures) seemed much easier to estimate, thus more popular, access (ability to acquire sufficient quantity and quality) remain largely elusive. The factors influencing household food access are often context specific, thus the financially and technically demand to collect and analyze data on all aspects of household’s subjective experience of food access and the development of valid and easy-to-use measures remain a huge challenge. Nevertheless there has been the development of several measures aimed at capturing the access component of food security with some notable examples developed by the USAID-funded Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance (FANTA) project, collaborating with Cornell and Tufts University and Africare and World Vision. These include:
• the Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS)- a continuous measure of the degree of food insecurity (access) in the household in the previous month
• the Household Dietary Diversity Scale (HDDS)-a measure of the number of different food groups consumed over a specific reference period (24hrs/48hrs/7days).
• the Household Hunger Scale (HHS)- a measure of experience of household food deprivation based on a set of predictable reactions, captured through a survey and summarized in a scale.
Another tool is the Coping Strategies Index (CSI), which assesses household behaviours and rates them based on a set of varied established behaviours on how households cope with food shortages. The methodology for this research is base on collecting data on a single question “What do you do when you do not have enough food, and do not have enough money to buy food?”
Food insecurity is measured in the United States by questions in the Census Bureau's Current Population Survey. The questions asked are about anxiety that the household budget is inadequate to buy enough food, inadequacy in the quantity or quality of food eaten by adults and children in the household, and instances of reduced food intake or consequences of reduced food intake for adults and for children. A National Academy of Sciences study commissioned by the USDA criticized this measurement and the relationship of "food security" to hunger, adding "it is not clear whether hunger is appropriately identified as the extreme end of the food security scale." Since 1960s, the US have been implementing a Food Stamp Program (now called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) to directly target consumers who lack the income to purchase food. According to Tim Josling, a Senior Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University, food stamps or other methods of distribution of purchasing power directly to consumers might fit into the range of international programs under consideration to tackle food insecurity.
In 2012, the FAO, World Food Programme (WFP), and International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) collaborated to produce the document titled The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2012. The document described improvements made by the FAO to the prevalence of undernourishment (PoU) indicator that is used to measure rates of food insecurity. New features include revised minimum dietary energy requirements for individual countries, updates to the world population data, and estimates of food losses in retail distribution for each country. Measurements that factor into the indicator include dietary energy supply, food production, food prices, food expenditures, and volatility of the food system.
Pillars of food securityThe WHO states that there are three pillars that determine food security: food availability, food access, and food use. The FAO adds a fourth pillar: the stability of the first three dimensions of food security over time. In 2009, the World Summit on Food Security stated that the “four pillars of food security are availability, access, utilization, and stability”.
Availability Food production is determined by a variety of factors including land ownership and use; soil management; crop selection, breeding, and management; livestock breeding and management; and harvesting. Crop production can be impacted by changes in rainfall and temperatures. The use of land, water, and energy to grow food often competes compete with other uses, which can effect food production. Land used for agriculture can be used for urbanization or lost to desertification, salinization, and soil erosion due to unsustainable agricultural practices. Crop production is not required for a country to achieve food security. Nations don’t have to have the natural resources required to produce crops in order to achieve food security, as seen in the examples of Japan and Singapore. Because food consumers outnumber producers in every country, food must be distributed to different regions or nations. Food distribution involves the storage, processing, transport, packaging, and marketing of food. Food-chain infrastructure and storage technologies on farms can also impact the amount of food wasted in the distribution process. Poor transport infrastructure can increase the price of supplying water and fertilizer as well as the price of moving food to national and global markets. Around the world, few individuals or households are continuously self-reliant for food. This creates the need for a bartering, exchange, or cash economy to acquire food. The exchange of food requires efficient trading systems and market institutions, which can have an impact on food security. Per capita world food supplies are more than adequate to provide food security to all, and thus food accessibility is a greater barrier to achieving food security.
AccessFood access refers to the affordability and allocation of food, as well as the preferences of individuals and households. The UN Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights noted that the causes of hunger and malnutrition are often not a scarcity of food but an inability to access available food, usually due to poverty. Poverty can limit access to food, and can also increase how vulnerable an individual or household is to food price spikes. Access depends on whether the household has enough income to purchase food at prevailing prices or has sufficient land and other resources to grow its own food. Households with enough resources can overcome unstable harvests and local food shortages and maintain their access to food.
There are two distinct types of access to food: direct access, in which a household produces food using human and material resources, and economic access, in which a household purchases food produced elsewhere. Location can affect access to food and which type of access a family will rely on. The assets of a household, including income, land, products of labor, inheritances, and gifts can determine a household’s access to food. However, the ability to access to sufficient food may not lead to the purchase of food over other materials and services. Demographics and education levels of members of the household as well as the gender of the household head determine the preferences of the household, which influences the type of food that are purchased. A household’s access to enough and nutritious food may not assure adequate food intake of all household members, as intrahousehold food allocation may not sufficiently meet the requirements of each member of the household.
UtilizationThe final pillar of food security is food utilization, which refers to the metabolism of food by individuals. Once food is obtained by a household, a variety of factors impact the quantity and quality of food that reaches members of the household. In order to achieve food security, the food ingested must be safe and must be enough to meet the physiological requirements of each individual. The safety of food impacts food utilization, and can by impacted by the preparation, processing, and cooking of food in the community and household. Nutritional values of the household determine the types of food that households choose to buy. Access to healthcare is another determinant of food utilization, since the health of individuals controls how the food is metabolized. For example, intestinal parasites can take nutrients from the body and decrease food utilization. Sanitation can also decrease the occurance and spread of diseases that can affect food utilization. Education about nutrition and food preparation can impact food utilization and improve this pillar of food security.
StabilityFood stability refers to the ability to obtain food over time. Food security can be transitory, seasonal, or chronic. In transitory food insecurity, food may be unavailable during certain periods of time. At the food production level, natural disasters and drought result in crop failure and decreased food availability. Civil conflicts can also decrease access to food. Instability in markets resulting in food-price spikes can cause transitory food insecurity. Other factors that can temporarily cause food insecurity are loss of employment or productivity, which can be caused by illness. Seasonal food insecurity can result from the regular pattern of growing seasons in food production.
Chronic (or permanent) food insecurity is defined as the long-term, persistent lack of adequate food. In this case, households are constantly at risk of being unable to acquire food to meet the needs of all members. Chronic and transitory food insecurity are linked, since the reoccurrence of transitory food security can make households more vulnerable to chronic food insecurity.
World Summit on Food SecurityThe World Summit on Food Security held in Rome in 1996, aimed to renew a global commitment to the fight against hunger. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) called the summit in response to widespread under-nutrition and growing concern about the capacity of agriculture to meet future food needs. The conference produced two key documents, the Rome Declaration on World Food Security and the World Food Summit Plan of Action.
The Rome Declaration calls for the members of the United Nations to work to halve the number of chronically undernourished people on the Earth by the year 2015. The Plan of Action sets a number of targets for government and non-governmental organizations for achieving food security, at the individual, household, national, regional and global levels.
Another World Summit on Food Security took place in Rome between November 16 and 18, 2009. The decision to convene the summit was taken by the Council of FAO in June 2009, at the proposal of FAO Director-General Dr Jacques Diouf. Heads of State and Government attended the summit, which took place at the FAO’s headquarters.
Effects of food insecurity
Stunting and chronic nutritional deficienciesHuman populations respond to chronic hunger and malnutrition by decreasing body size, known in medical terms as stunting or stunted growth. This process starts in utero if the mother is malnourished and continues through approximately the third year of life. It leads to higher infant and child mortality, but at rates far lower than during famines. Once stunting has occurred, improved nutritional intake later in life cannot reverse the damage. Stunting itself is viewed as a coping mechanism, designed to bring body size into alignment with the calories available during adulthood in the location where the child is born. Limiting body size as a way of adapting to low levels of energy (calories) adversely affects health in three ways:
- Premature failure of vital organs occurs during adulthood. For example, a 50-year-old individual might die of heart failure because his/her heart suffered structural defects during early development;
- Stunted individuals suffer a far higher rate of disease and illness than those who have not undergone stunting;
- Severe malnutrition in early childhood often leads to defects in cognitive development.
"The analysis ... points to the misleading nature of the concept of subsistence as Malthus originally used it and as it is still widely used today. Subsistence is not located at the edge of a nutritional cliff, beyond which lies demographic disaster. Rather than one level of subsistence, there are numerous levels at which a population and a food supply can be in equilibrium in the sense that they can be indefinitely sustained. However, some levels will have smaller people and higher normal mortality than others."
Challenges to achieving food security"The number of people without enough food to eat on a regular basis remains stubbornly high, at over 800 million, and is not falling significantly. Over 60% of the world's undernourished people live in Asia, and a quarter in Africa. The proportion of people who are hungry, however, is greater in Africa (33%) than Asia (16%). The latest FAO figures indicate that there are 22 countries, 16 of which are in Africa, in which the undernourishment prevalence rate is over 35%."
The agriculture-hunger-poverty nexusEradicating hunger and poverty requires an understanding of the ways in which these two injustices interconnect. Hunger, and the malnourishment that accompanies it, prevents poor people from escaping poverty because it diminishes their ability to learn, work, and care for themselves and their family members. Food insecurity exists when people are undernourished as a result of the physical unavailability of food, their lack of social or economic access to adequate food, and/or inadequate food use. Food-insecure people are those whose food intake falls below their minimum calorie (energy) requirements, as well as those who exhibit physical symptoms caused by energy and nutrient deficiencies resulting from an inadequate or unbalanced diet or from the body's inability to use food effectively because of infection or disease. An alternative view would define the concept of food insecurity as referring only to the consequence of inadequate consumption of nutritious food, considering the physiological use of food by the body as being within the domain of nutrition and health. Malnourishment also leads to poor health hence individuals fail to provide for their families. If left unaddressed, hunger sets in motion an array of outcomes that perpetuate malnutrition, reduce the ability of adults to work and to give birth to healthy children, and erode children's ability to learn and lead productive, healthy, and happy lives. This truncation of human development undermines a country's potential for economic development for generations to come.
Global water crisisWater deficits, which are already spurring heavy grain imports in numerous smaller countries, may soon do the same in larger countries, such as China or India. The water tables are falling in scores of countries (including northern China, the US, and India) due to widespread overpumping using powerful diesel and electric pumps. Other countries affected include Pakistan, Afghanistan, and Iran. This will eventually lead to water scarcity and cutbacks in grain harvest. Even with the overpumping of its aquifers, China is developing a grain deficit. When this happens, it will almost certainly drive grain prices upward. Most of the 3 billion people projected to be born worldwide by mid-century will be born in countries already experiencing water shortages. After China and India, there is a second tier of smaller countries with large water deficits – Afghanistan, Algeria, Egypt, Iran, Mexico, and Pakistan. Four of these already import a large share of their grain. Only Pakistan remains self-sufficient. But with a population expanding by 4 million a year, it will likely soon turn to the world market for grain.
Regionally, Sub-Saharan Africa has the largest number of water-stressed countries of any other place on the globe and as of an estimated 800 million people who live in Africa, 300 million live in a water stressed environment. It is estimated that by 2030, 75 million to 250 million people in Africa will be living in areas of high water stress, which will likely displace anywhere between 24 million and 700 million people as conditions become increasingly unlivable. Because the majority of Africa remains dependent on an agricultural lifestyle and 80% to 90% of all families in rural Africa rely upon producing their own food, water scarcity translates to a loss of food security.
Multimillion dollar investments beginning in the 1990s by the World Bank have reclaimed desert and turned the Ica Valley in Peru, one of the driest places on earth, into the largest supplier of asparagus in the world. However, the constant irrigation has caused a rapid drop in the water table, in some places as much as eight meters per year, one of the fastest rates of aquifer depletion in the world. The wells of small farmers and local people are beginning to run dry and the water supply for the main city in the valley is under threat. As a cash crop, asparagus has provided jobs for local people, but most of the money goes to the buyers, mainly the British. A 2010 report concluded that the industry is not sustainable and accuses investors, including the World Bank, of failing to take proper responsibility for the impact of their decisions on the water resources of poorer countries. Diverting water from the headwaters of the Ica River to asparagus fields has also led to a water shortage in the mountain region of Huancavelica, where indigenous communities make a marginal living herding.
Land degradationIntensive farming often leads to a vicious cycle of exhaustion of soil fertility and decline of agricultural yields. Approximately 40% of the world's agricultural land is seriously degraded. In Africa, if current trends of soil degradation continue, the continent might be able to feed just 25% of its population by 2025, according to UNU's Ghana-based Institute for Natural Resources in Africa.
Land dealsRich governments and corporations are buying up the rights to millions of hectares of agricultural land in developing countries in an effort to secure their own long-term food supplies. The head of the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), Jacques Diouf, has warned that the controversial rise in land deals could create a form of "neocolonialism", with poor states producing food for the rich at the expense of their own hungry people. The South Korean firm Daewoo Logistics has secured a large piece of farmland in Madagascar to grow maize and crops for biofuels. Libya has secured 250,000 hectares of Ukrainian farmland, and China has begun to explore land deals in Southeast Asia. Oil-rich Arab investors, including the sovereign wealth funds, are looking into Sudan, Ethiopia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Pakistan, Cambodia and Thailand.
Some countries are using the acquisition of land for agriculture in return for other gains. Egypt is seeking land acquisition in Ukraine in exchange for access to its natural gas. Qatar has plans to lease 40,000 hectares of agricultural land along Kenya's coast to grow fruit and vegetables, in return for building a £2.4 billion port close to the Indian Ocean tourist island of Lamu.
AgricultureExtreme events, such as droughts and floods, are forecast to increase as climate change takes hold. Ranging from overnight floods to gradually worsening droughts, these will have a range of impacts on the agricultural sector. By 2040, almost the entire Nile region, which once included large areas of irrigated agricultural land, is expected to become hot desert where cultivation is impossible due to water limitation. According to the Climate & Development Knowledge Network report Managing Climate Extremes and Disasters in the Agriculture Sectors: Lessons from the IPCC SREX Report, the impacts will include changing productivity and livelihood patterns, economic losses, and impacts on infrastructure, markets and food security. Food security in future will be linked to our ability to adapt agricultural systems to extreme events. For example, the Garifuna women in Honduras are helping to ensure food security locally by reviving and improving production of traditional root crops, building up traditional methods of soil conservation, carrying out training in organic composting and pesticide use and creating the first Garifuna farmers' market. Sixteen towns have worked together to establish tool and seed banks. Efforts to plant wild fruit trees along the coast are helping to prevent soil erosion. The aim is to reduce the communities' vulnerability to the hazards of shifting weather patterns.
Approximately 2.4 billion people live in the drainage basin of the Himalayan rivers. India, China, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Myanmar could experience floods followed by severe droughts in coming decades. In India alone, the Ganges provides water for drinking and farming for more than 500 million people. The west coast of North America, which gets much of its water from glaciers in mountain ranges such as the Rocky Mountains and Sierra Nevada, also would be affected. Glaciers aren't the only worry that the developing nations have; sea level is reported to rise as climate change progresses, reducing the amount of land available for agriculture.
In other parts of the world, a big effect will be low yields of grain according to the World Food Trade Model, specifically in the low latitude regions where much of the developing world is located. From this the price of grain will rise, along with the developing nations trying to grow the grain. Due to this, every 2–2.5% price hike will increase the number of hungry people by 1%. Low crop yields are just one of the problem facing farmers in the low latitudes and tropical regions. The timing and length of the growing seasons, when farmers plant their crops, are going to be changing dramatically, per the USDA, due to unknown changes in soil temperature and moisture conditions.
Agricultural diseasesUg99, a lineage of wheat stem rust which can cause up to 100% crop losses, is present in wheat fields in several countries in Africa and the Middle East and is predicted to spread rapidly through these regions and possibly further afield, potentially causing a wheat production disaster that would affect food security worldwide.
The genetic diversity of the crop wild relatives of wheat can be used to improve modern varieties to be more resistant to rust. In their centers of origin wild wheat plants are screened for resistance to rust, then their genetic information is studied and finally wild plants and modern varieties are crossed through means of modern plant breeding in order to transfer the resistance genes from the wild plants to the modern varieties. 
Biotechnology for smallholders in the (sub)tropicsThe area sown to genetically engineered crops in developing countries is rapidly catching up with the area sown in industrial nations. According to the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA), genetically engineered (biotech, GM) crops were grown by approximately 8.5 million farmers in 21 countries in 2005; up from 8.25 million farmers in 17 countries in 2004. The largest increase in biotech crop area in any country in 2005 was in Brazil, provisionally estimated at 44,000 km² (94,000 km² in 2005 compared with 50,000 km² in 2004). India had by far the largest year-on-year proportional increase, with almost a threefold increase from 5,000 km² in 2004 to 13,000 km² in 2005. However, it should be noted that the ISAAA is funded by organisations including prominent agricultural biotechnology corporations, such as Monsanto and Bayer, and there have been several challenges made to the accuracy of ISAAA's global figures.
Current high regulatory costs imposed on varieties created by the more modern methods are a significant hurdle for development of genetically engineered crops well suited to developing country farmers by modern genetic methods. Once a new variety is developed, however, seed provides a good vehicle for distribution of improvements in a package that is familiar to the farmer.
Currently there are some institutes and research groups that have projects in which biotechnology is shared with contact people in less-developed countries on a non-profit basis. These institutes make use of biotechnological methods that do not involve high research and registration costs, such as conservation and multiplication of germplasm and phytosanitation.
Apart from genetic engineering, other forms of biotechnology also hold promise for enhancing food security. For instance, perennial rice is being developed in China, which could dramatically reduce the risk of soil erosion on upland smallholder farms.
Dictatorship and kleptocracyNobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen has observed that "there is no such thing as an apolitical food problem." While drought and other naturally occurring events may trigger famine conditions, it is government action or inaction that determines its severity, and often even whether or not a famine will occur. The 20th century is full of examples of governments undermining the food security of their own nations–sometimes intentionally.
When governments come to power by force or rigged elections, and not by way of fair and open elections, their base of support is often narrow and built upon cronyism and patronage. Under such conditions "The distribution of food within a country is a political issue. Governments in most countries give priority to urban areas, since that is where the most influential and powerful families and enterprises are usually located. The government often neglects subsistence farmers and rural areas in general. The more remote and underdeveloped the area the less likely the government will be to effectively meet its needs. Many agrarian policies, especially the pricing of agricultural commodities, discriminate against rural areas. Governments often keep prices of basic grains at such artificially low levels that subsistence producers cannot accumulate enough capital to make investments to improve their production. Thus, they are effectively prevented from getting out of their precarious situation."
Further dictators and warlords have used food as a political weapon, rewarding their supporters while denying food supplies to areas that oppose their rule. Under such conditions food becomes a currency with which to buy support and famine becomes an effective weapon to be used against the opposition.
Governments with strong tendencies towards kleptocracy can undermine food security even when harvests are good. When government monopolizes trade, farmers may find that they are free to grow cash crops for export, but under penalty of law only able to sell their crops to government buyers at prices far below the world market price. The government then is free to sell their crop on the world market at full price, pocketing the difference. This creates an artificial "poverty trap" from which even the most hard working and motivated farmers may not escape.
When the rule of law is absent, or private property is non-existent, farmers have little incentive to improve their productivity. If a farm becomes noticeably more productive than neighboring farms, it may become the target of individuals well connected to the government. Rather than risk being noticed and possibly losing their land, farmers may be content with the perceived safety of mediocrity.
As pointed out by William Bernstein in his book The Birth of Plenty: "Individuals without property are susceptible to starvation, and it is much easier to bend the fearful and hungry to the will of the state. If a [farmer's] property can be arbitrarily threatened by the state, that power will inevitably be employed to intimidate those with divergent political and religious opinions."
Risks to food security
Population growthCurrent UN projections show a continued increase in population in the near future (but a steady decline in the population growth rate), with the global population expected to reach between 8.3 and 10.9 billion by 2050. UN Population Divisionestimates for the year 2150 range between 3.2 and 24.8 billion; mathematical modeling supports the lower estimate. Some analysts have questioned the sustainability of further world population growth, highlighting the growing pressures on the environment, global food supplies, and energy resources. Solutions for feeding the nine billion in the future are being studied and documented.
Fossil fuel dependenceWhile agricultural output increased as a result of the Green Revolution, the energy input into the process (that is, the energy that must be expended to produce a crop) has also increased at a greater rate, so that the ratio of crops produced to energy input has decreased over time. Green Revolution techniques also heavily rely on chemical fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides, some of which must be developed from fossil fuels, making agriculture increasingly reliant on petroleum products.
Between 1950 and 1984, as the Green Revolution transformed agriculture around the globe, world grain production increased by 250%. The energy for the Green Revolution was provided by fossil fuels in the form of fertilizers (natural gas), pesticides (oil), and hydrocarbon fueled irrigation.
David Pimentel, professor of ecology and agriculture at Cornell University, and Mario Giampietro, senior researcher at the National Research Institute on Food and Nutrition (INRAN), place in their study Food, Land, Population and the U.S. Economy the maximum U.S. population for a sustainable economy at 200 million. To achieve a sustainable economy and avert disaster, the United States must reduce its population by at least one-third, and world population will have to be reduced by two-thirds, says the study.
The authors of this study believe that the mentioned agricultural crisis will only begin to impact us after 2020, and will not become critical until 2050. The oncoming peaking of global oil production (and subsequent decline of production), along with the peak of North American natural gas production will very likely precipitate this agricultural crisis much sooner than expected. Geologist Dale Allen Pfeiffer claims that coming decades could see spiraling food prices without relief and massive starvation on a global level such as never experienced before.
Hybridization, genetic engineering and loss of biodiversityIn agriculture and animal husbandry, the Green Revolution popularized the use of conventional hybridization to increase yield by creating "high-yielding varieties". Often the handful of hybridized breeds originated in developed countries and were further hybridized with local varieties in the rest of the developing world to create high yield strains resistant to local climate and diseases. Local governments and industry have been pushing hybridization which has resulted in several of the indigenous breeds becoming extinct or threatened. Disuse because of unprofitability and uncontrolled intentional and unintentional cross-pollination and crossbreeding (genetic pollution), formerly huge gene pools of various wild and indigenous breeds have collapsed causing widespread genetic erosion and genetic pollution. This has resulted in loss of genetic diversity and biodiversity as a whole.
A genetically modified organism (GMO) is an organism whose genetic material has been altered using the genetic engineering techniques generally known as recombinant DNA technology. Genetically Modified (GM) crops today have become a common source for genetic pollution, not only of wild varieties but also of other domesticated varieties derived from relatively natural hybridization.
Genetic erosion coupled with genetic pollution may be destroying unique genotypes, thereby creating a hidden crisis which could result in a severe threat to our food security. Diverse genetic material could cease to exist which would impact our ability to further hybridize food crops and livestock against more resistant diseases and climatic changes.
Intellectual property rightsThere is much debate on whether IPRs hurt or harm independent development in terms or agriculture and food production. Hartmut Meyer and Annette von Lossau describe both sides of the issue, while saying "Among scholars, the thesis that the impetus to self-determined development and the protection of intellectual property go hand in hand is disputed – to put it mildly. Many studies have concluded that there is virtually no positive correlation between establishing self-sustained economic growth and ensuring protection of intellectual property rights.
Price settingOn April 30, 2008, Thailand, one of the world's biggest rice exporters, announces the project of the creation of the Organisation of Rice Exporting Countries with the potential to develop into a price-fixing cartel for rice. It is a project to organize 21 rice exporting countries to create a homonymous organisation to control the price of rice. The group is mainly made up of Thailand, Vietnam, Cambodia, Laos and Myanmar. The organization attempts so serve the purpose of making a "contribution to ensuring food stability, not just in an individual country but also to address food shortages in the region and the world". However, it is still questionable whether this organization will serve its role as an effective rice price fixing cartel, that is similar to OPEC's mechanism for managing petroleum. Economic analysts and traders said the proposal would go nowhere because of the inability of governments to cooperate with each other and control farmers' output. Moreover, countries that are involved expressed their concern, that this could only worsen the food security. 
Treating food the same as other internationally traded commoditiesOn October 23, 2008, Associated Press reported the following:
"Former President Clinton told a U.N. gathering Thursday [Oct 16, 2008] that the global food crisis shows "we all blew it, including me," by treating food crops "like color TVs" instead of as a vital commodity for the world's poor....Clinton criticized decades of policymaking by the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and others, encouraged by the U.S., that pressured Africans in particular into dropping government subsidies for fertilizer, improved seed and other farm inputs as a requirement to get aid. Africa's food self-sufficiency declined and food imports rose. Now skyrocketing prices in the international grain trade—on average more than doubling between 2006 and early 2008—have pushed many in poor countries deeper into poverty."
Food is not a commodity like others. We should go back to a policy of maximum food self-sufficiency. It is crazy for us to think we can develop countries around the world without increasing their ability to feed themselves.
Children and food securityUNICEF UK report found that the world’s poorest and most vulnerable children are being hit the hardest by the impact of climate change. The report, "Our Climate, Our Children, Our Responsibility: The Implications of Climate Change for the World’s Children," says access to clean water and food supplies will become more difficult, particularly in Africa and Asia.
By way of comparison, in one of the largest food producing countries in the world, the United States, approximately one out of six people are "food insecure", including 17 million children, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture. A 2012 study in the Journal of Applied Research on Children found that rates of food security varied significantly by race, class and education. In both kindergarten and third grade, 8% of the children were classified as food insecure, but only 5% of white children were food insecure, while 12% and 15% of black and Hispanic children were food insecure, respectively. In third grade, 13% of black and 11% of Hispanic children are food insecure compared to 5% of white children.
Gender and food securityGender inequality is a major cause and effect of hunger and poverty. Food security can be a major concern for people who are incapable of or denied access to participating in labor, either formal, informal, or agricultural. In 2009, the U.N. estimated that 60 percent of the world’s chronically hungry people are women and girls, 98% of which live in developing nations. When women have an income, substantial evidence indicates that the income is more likely to be spent on food and children’s needs. Women are generally responsible for food selection and preparation and for the care and feeding of children. Women play many roles in land use, production, processing, distribution, market access, trade, and food availability. They often work as unpaid, contributing family workers, or self-employed producers, on and off-farm employees, entrepreneurs, traders, providers of services, and caretakers of children and the elderly. Women farmers represent more than a quarter of the world’s population, comprising on average, 43 percent of the agricultural workforce in developing countries, ranging from 20 percent in Latin America to 50 percent in Eastern Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa. However, women have less access than men to agricultural assets, inputs and services. Analysts suggest that if women have the same access to productive resources as men, women could boost yield by 20–30 percent; raising the overall agricultural output in developing countries by two and a half to four percent. This gain in production could lessen the number of hungry people in the world by 12–17 percent.
The United States Agency for International Development program, Feed the Future, quotes on their website that "Women’s contributions to agricultural production often go unrecognized. Despite their significant role as agricultural producers, women’s access to land and other key productive resources can be limited, and they rarely have legal control over the land they farm. Reducing gender inequality and recognizing the contribution of women to agriculture is critical to achieving global food security—there is consistent and compelling evidence that when the status of women is improved, agricultural productivity increases, poverty is reduced, and nutrition improves."
Barriers to gendered food securityWhile varying by region, women face social and economic barriers to achieving personal and household food security. A comprehension of the gendered dimensions of food insecurity, which includes family size, household obligations, access to wage-labor, and the social constrictions on land use, productivity and intake, render individuals more capable of making educated decisions regarding their own health and that of their household. Improvement in food security strategies by individuals and households allows more time and resources to be directed towards improving economic situations, through investments in better means of production, further education, other quality of life measures, which can improve the status of communities. Macroeconomic factors should also be taken into account, such as the emergence of neo-liberal capitalist policies imposed through the Washington Consensus which include Structural Adjustment Programs, austerity measures, and an emphasis on expanding export-oriented trade at the expense of small-scale producers and rural development. The Center for Women's Global Leadership reported in 2011 that the expectation that this economic shift would increase the global food supply resulted in the strengthening of powerful transnational companies through heavy subsidization, while overall food security faltered as "developing countries withdrew investment in agriculture and rural development, leading to a decline in their long-term productive capacity and transforming them into net food importers."
Land rights and inheritanceWomen may have temporary or illegal use of land, but their ability to own or inherit land is restricted in much of the developing world. Even in countries where women are legally permitted to own land, such as Uganda, research from Women’s Land Link Africa shows that cultural customs have excluded them from obtaining land ownership. Globally, women own less than 20% of agricultural land. Typically, land is obtained through social inheritance, through the market, or from the state. In most developing countries, a woman’s use of land is restricted to temporary cultivation rights, allocated to her by her husband, and in exchange, she provides food and other goods for the household. She is not able to pass the land on to her heirs nor will she be entrusted with the land if her husband dies; the land is automatically granted to her husband’s family or any children the couple may have produced. Bina Agarwal, a development economist known for her work on women's property rights, states "the single most important factor affecting women’s situation is the gender gap in command over property."
Increasingly, as land privatization leads to the end of communal lands, women find themselves unable to use any land not bestowed upon them by their families, rendering unmarried women and widows vulnerable. Many women still face legal hurdles when attempting to acquire land through inheritance or the marketplace. In order to reorganize post-colonial societies, SADC states have engaged in land redistribution and resettlement programs, ranging from temporary lease-holding to permanent property rights. Even in cases where no gender bias is present in land redistribution policy, oftentimes social custom permits officials to favor male-headed households and individual men over female-headed households and individual women.
Division of unpaid labor and time constraintsParticularly in rural areas, the use of women’s time in agriculture is often constrained by obligations such as fetching water and wood, preparing meals for their families, cleaning, and tending to children and livestock. For example, in Ghana, Tanzania, and Zambia women expend most of their energy on load-carrying activities involving transport of fuel-wood, water, and grain for grinding.
Climate change can present additional challenges to women’s time availability, due to deforestation, pollution, changes in irrigation and rain patters, and the depletion of natural resources. A gender-based assessment of roles and practices in maintaining crop production and household resources such as fuel and water is recommended in order to understand the social and environmental factors surrounding men's and women's work.
The gendered division of labor in agriculture has been known to create unequal household power dynamics, responsibilities, and benefits from agriculture.
Crop typesAs producers, women are sometimes relegated to the production of subsistence crops on marginal land. In comparison, men tend to produce cash crops on land nearer to the home or marketplace for ease of access. The distance between a woman’s home, crops, and the nearest marketplace can pose logistical problems in transportation, and create another type of time constraint.
The use of cash cropping by men and subsistence agriculture by women tends to increase men’s bargaining power relative to women’s. According to L. Muthoni Wanyeki, the author of Women and Land in Africa: Culture, Religion, and Realizing Women’s Rights, "Control over food crops and poultry or goats (and benefits derived from surpluses of food crops and small farm animals) tend to rest with women. However, control over the type of cash crop and livestock (and benefits derived therefrom) tended to rest with men, even where women had made an exceptional and direct contribution to the labour involved."
Access to credit, technology, education, markets, and government servicesWomen have limited access to rural extension services and technology. Women's success in food security in most countries revolves around their access to equal resources as men, including the rights to land ownership, unequal wages, unequal access to credit, technology, education, markets, and government services. The right to food can be hindered by problems such as increased demand, price volatility, climate change characterized by land degradation and water scarcity, competition for land, urbanization, and increased poverty and vulnerability. Individual decisions regarding livelihoods, family planning, migration, agricultural production and political participation can have varying outcomes regarding food security which have repercussions beyond the individual's control.
On a macroeconomic level, cuts in government spending and investment in rural development and agricultural policies, production incentives, price stabilization measures, and subsidies for small-scale producers have directly decreased the viability of women's agricultural projects. The privatization of services like health, water, and sanitation have indirectly hindered rural women and children from escaping poverty traps which constrain their ability to sustainably produce food for themselves and for market. The Center for Women's Global Leadership writes that "trade liberalization policies have increased their work burden and undermined their right to food."
Gender and global food security policy
Proposed policiesSpeaking on September 19, 2011 at a U.N. General Assembly event highlighting women and agriculture, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said "When we liberate the economic potential of women, we elevate the economic performance of communities, nations, and the world."
A collaborative report by the World Bank, Food and Agriculture Organization, and the International Fund for Agricultural Development in 2009 concluded that several major policy decisions could be implemented to improve food security from a feminist perspective. These policy suggestions include:
- special safeguard mechanisms, such as reserve grain storage, price regulations, and crop diversification
- food stocks
- commodity exchange regulations
- regulating trade with transnational corporations
- restricting monopolies
- social welfare
- research, concerning climate change, nutritional requirements, and policy deliberation
- innovation in food production and food security strategies
Many small-scale, women-centered, agricultural cooperatives have emerged in developing countries to fulfill these needs by pooling resources, establishing economies of scale, and creating greater collective bargaining power for resources, land rights, and market access. One such urban agriculture project is Abalimi Bezekhaya, in Cape Town, South Africa, which provides training, manure, set-up and maintenance of an irrigation system, and R150 ($15 USD) to each participant. Most of the participants are women. According to Liziwe Stofile, who trains new farmers, "The reason that women take over most of the community gardens is because they want to take vegetables home to feed their children. The men only want to make money."
Women's empowerment in agriculture indexTo improve the status of women in agriculture, improve nutrition, and decrease poverty, USAID created an index to study women’s empowerment in agriculture in 2012.
The Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index (WEAI) is the first measure to directly capture women's empowerment and inclusion levels in the agricultural sector. The index considers five factors to be indicative of women’s overall empowerment in the agricultural sector:
- Decisions over agricultural production
- Power over productive resources such as land and livestock
- Decisions over income
- Leadership in the community
- Time use
By the FAOIn its "The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2003", FAO states that:
- 'In general the countries that succeeded in reducing hunger were characterised by more rapid economic growth and specifically more rapid growth in their agricultural sectors. They also exhibited slower population growth, lower levels of HIV and higher ranking in the Human Development Index'. As such, according to FAO, addressing agriculture and population growth is vital to achieving food security. Other organisations and people (e.g., Peter Singer) have come to this same conclusion and advocate improvements in agriculture and population control.
By the UNUN Millennium Development Goals are one of the initiatives aimed at achieving food security in the world. In its list of goals, the first Millennium Development Goal states that the UN "is to eradicate extreme hunger and poverty", and that "agricultural productivity is likely to play a key role in this if it is to be reached on time".
"Of the eight Millennium Development Goals, eradicating extreme hunger and poverty depends on agriculture the most. (MDG 1 calls for halving hunger and poverty by 2015 in relation to 1990.)
By the USAIDUSAID proposes several key steps to increasing agricultural productivity which is in turn key to increasing rural income and reducing food insecurity. They include:
- Boosting agricultural science and technology. Current agricultural yields are insufficient to feed the growing populations. Eventually, the rising agricultural productivity drives economic growth.
- Securing property rights and access to finance.
- Enhancing human capital through education and improved health.
- Conflict prevention and resolution mechanisms and democracy and governance based on principles of accountability and transparency in public institutions and the rule of law are basic to reducing vulnerable members of society.
Notably, the gathering of wild food plants appears to be an efficient alternative method of subsistence in tropical countries, which may play a role in poverty alleviation.
Improving agricultural productivity to benefit the rural poormalnutrition are greater in these areas than in urban areas. Moreover, the higher the proportion of the rural population that obtains its income solely from subsistence farming (without the benefit of pro-poor technologies and access to markets), the higher the incidence of malnutrition. Therefore, improvements in agricultural productivity aimed at small-scale farmers will benefit the rural poor first. Food and feed crop demand is likely to double in the next 50 years, as the global population approaches nine billion. Growing sufficient food will require people to make changes such as increasing productivity in areas dependent on rainfed agriculture; improving soil fertility management; expanding cropped areas; investing in irrigation; conducting agricultural trade between countries; and reducing gross food demand by influencing diets and reducing post-harvest losses.
According to the Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture, a major study led by the International Water Management Institute, managing rainwater and soil moisture more effectively, and using supplemental and small-scale irrigation, hold the key to helping the greatest number of poor people. It has called for a new era of water investments and policies for upgrading rainfed agriculture that would go beyond controlling field-level soil and water to bring new freshwater sources through better local management of rainfall and runoff. Increased agricultural productivity enables farmers to grow more food, which translates into better diets and, under market conditions that offer a level playing field, into higher farm incomes. With more money, farmers are more likely to diversify production and grow higher-value crops, benefiting not only themselves but the economy as a whole."
Researchers suggest forming an alliance between the emergency food program and community-supported agriculture, as some countries' food stamps cannot be used at farmer's markets and places where food is less processed and grown locally.
|This section does not cite any references or sources. (May 2008)|
Westernized viewConventional individualist thinking in westernized countries is that maximizing farmers' profits is the surest way of maximizing agricultural production; the higher a farmer’s profit, the greater the effort that will be forthcoming, and the greater the risk the farmer is willing to take.
Place into the hands of farmers the largest number and highest quality tools possible (tools is used here to refer to improved production techniques, improved seeds, secure land tenure, accurate weather forecasts, etc.) However, it is left to the individual farmer to pick and choose which tools to use, and how to use them, as farmers have intimate knowledge of their own land and local conditions.
As with other businesses, a percentage of the profits are normally reinvested into the business in the hopes of increasing production, and hence increase future profits. Normally higher profits translate into higher spending on technologies designed to boost production, such as drip irrigation systems, agriculture education, and greenhouses. An increased profit also increases the farmer’s incentive to engage in double-cropping, soil improvement programs, and expanding usable area.
Food justiceAn alternative view takes a collective approach to achieve food security. It notes that globally enough food is produced to feed the entire world population at a level adequate to ensure that everyone can be free of hunger and fear of starvation. That no one should live without enough food because of economic constraints or social inequalities is the basic goal.
This approach is often referred to as food justice and views food security as a basic human right. It advocates fairer distribution of food, particularly grain crops, as a means of ending chronic hunger and malnutrition. The core of the Food Justice movement is the belief that what is lacking is not food, but the political will to fairly distribute food regardless of the recipient’s ability to pay.
Food sovereigntyA third approach is known as food sovereignty; though it overlaps with food justice on several points, the two are not identical. It views the business practices of multinational corporations as a form of neocolonialism. It contends that multinational corporations have the financial resources available to buy up the agricultural resources of impoverished nations, particularly in the tropics. They also have the political clout to convert these resources to the exclusive production of cash crops for sale to industrialized nations outside of the tropics, and in the process to squeeze the poor off of the more productive lands. Under this view subsistence farmers are left to cultivate only lands that are so marginal in terms of productivity as to be of no interest to the multinational corporations. Likewise, food sovereignty holds it to be true that communities should be able to define their own means of production and that food is a basic human right. With several multinational corporations now pushing agricultural technologies on developing countries, technologies that include improved seeds, chemical fertilizers, and pesticides, crop production has become an increasingly analyzed and debated issue. Many communities calling for food sovereignty are protesting the imposition of Western technologies on to their indigenous systems and agency.
- 2020 Vision Initiative
- Afrique verte
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
- Consultative Group on International Agricultural Research
- Community Food Security Coalition
- Famine Early Warning Systems Network
- Food First
- Global Crop Diversity Trust
- Local Food Plus
- International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development
- International Fund for Agricultural Development
- Rockefeller Foundation
- FAO Agricultural and Development Economics Division (June 2006). Food Security (2). Retrieved June 8, 2012.
- De Schutter, Olivier (December 2010). "Report submitted by the Special Rapporteur on the right to food". United Nations. p. 1-21. Retrieved 22 October 2013.
- [dead link]years=1961-1961,1962-1962,1963-1963,1964-1964,1965-1965,1966-1966,1967-1967,1968-1968,1969-1969,1970-1970,1971-1971,1972-1972,1973-1973,1974-1974,1975-1975,1976-1976,1977-1977,1978-1978,1979-1979,1980-1980,1981-1981,1982-1982,1983-1983,1984-1984,1985-1985,1986–1986,1987–1987,1988–1988,1989–1989,1990–1990,1991–1991,1992–1992,1993–1993,1994–1994,1995–1995,1996–1996,1997–1997,1998–1998,1999–1999,2000–2000,2001–2001,2002–2002,2003–2003,2004–2004,2005–2005&variable_ID=180&theme=8&cID=&ccID=0 Agriculture and Food—Agricultural Production Indices: Food production per capita index, World Resources Institute
- "http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/in_depth/8309979.stm". BBC News. October 16, 2009. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- : The 2007/08 Agricultural Price Spikes, Causes and Policy Implications[dead link]
- "2008: The year of global food crisis". Sundayherald.com. March 8, 2008. Retrieved November 13, 2011. [dead link]
- "The global grain bubble". Csmonitor.com. January 18, 2008. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- James Randerson, science correspondent (March 7, 2008). "Food crisis will take hold before climate change, warns chief scientist". The Guardian (UK). Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- John Vidal, environment editor (November 3, 2007). "Global food crisis looms as climate change and fuel shortages bite". The Guardian (UK). Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- Walsoft (February 22, 2008). "Experts: Global Food Shortages Could ‘Continue for Decades'". Marketoracle.co.uk. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- Moya K. Mason. "Has Urbanization Caused a Loss to Agricultural Land?". Moyak.com. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- Walt, Vivienne (February 27, 2008). "The World's Growing Food-Price Crisis". Time. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- "The cost of food: Facts and figures". BBC News. October 16, 2008. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- "Food Price Unrest Around the World, September 2007– April 2008". Earth-policy.org. Retrieved November 13, 2011. [dead link]
- : The role of demand for biofuel in the agricultural commodity price spikes of 2007/08[dead link]
- Jonathan Watts in Beijing (December 5, 2007). "Riots and hunger feared as demand for grain sends food costs soaring". The Guardian (UK). Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- Julian Borger, diplomatic editor (February 26, 2008). "Feed the world? We are fighting a losing battle, UN admits". The Guardian (UK). Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- Amid strong farm economy, some worry about increased debt, Associated Press, April 20, 2008[dead link]
- "Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food". Springer.com. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- "Chapter 2. Food security: concepts and measurement". Fao.org. Retrieved 2011-03-16.
- "FAO Practical Guide: Basic Concepts of Food Security" (PDF). Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- "Food Security in the United States: Measuring Household Food Security". USDA. Retrieved 2008-02-23.
- Ayalew, Melaku. "Food Security and Famine and Hunger". Retrieved 21 October 2013.
- Webb, P; Coates, J., Frongillo, E. A., Rogers, B. L., Swindale, A., & Bilinsky, P. (2006). "Measuring household food insecurity: why it's so important and yet so difficult to do.". The Journal of nutrition 136 (5): 1404s–1408s.
- Perez-Escamilla, Rafael; Segall-Correa, Ana Maria (2008). "Food insecurity measurement and indicators". Revista de Nutrição, 21: 15–26. Retrieved 31 July 2013.
- Barrett, C. B. (11 February 2010). "Measuring Food Insecurity". Science 327 (5967): 825–828. doi:10.1126/science.1182768.
- Swindale, A; Bilinsky, P. (2006). "Development of a universally applicable household food insecurity measurement tool: process, current status, and outstanding issues.". The Journal of nutrition 136 (5): 1449S–1452S. Retrieved 31 July 2013.
- Swindale, A., & Bilinsky, P. (2006). Household Dietary Diversity Score (HDDS) for measurement of household food access: Indicator guide (v.2).. Washington DC: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Academy for Educational Development.
- Coates, Jennifer, Anne Swindale and Paula Bilinsky (2007). Household Food Insecurity Access Scale (HFIAS) for Measurement of Household Food Access: Indicator Guide (v. 3).. Washington, D.C.:: Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance Project, Academy for Educational Development.
- Ballard,Terri; Coates, Jennifer; Swindale, Anne; and Deitchler, Megan (2011). Household Hunger Scale: Indicator Definition and Measurement Guide. Washington DC: FANTA-2 Bridge, FHI 360.
- Maxwell, Daniel G. (1996). "Measuring food insecurity: the frequency and severity of "coping strategies"". Food Policy 21 (3): 291–303. doi:10.1016/0306-9192(96)00005-X.
- Oldewage-Theron, Wilna H.; Dicks, Emsie G.; Napier, Carin E. (2006). "Poverty, household food insecurity and nutrition: Coping strategies in an informal settlement in the Vaal Triangle, South Africa". Public Health 120 (9): 795–804. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2006.02.009.
- Maxwell, Daniel; Caldwell, Richard; Langworthy, Mark (1 December 2008). "Measuring food insecurity: Can an indicator based on localized coping behaviors be used to compare across contexts?". Food Policy 33 (6): 533–540. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.02.004.
- USDA, Food Security Measurement. http://www.fns.usda.gov/fsec/Measurement.htm
- "Measuring Food Insecurity and Hunger: Phase 1 Report". Nap.edu. Retrieved 2011-03-16.
- Global Food Stamps: An Idea Worth Considering, August 2011, ICTSD, Issue Paper No.36.
- FAO, WFP, and IFAD (2012). The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2012. Rome: FAO.
- WHO. "Food Security". Retrieved 15 October 2013.
- FAO (2009). Declaration of the World Food Summit on Food Security. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.
- Gregory, P. J.; Ingram, J. S. I.; Brklacich, M. (29 November 2005). "Climate change and food security". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 360 (1463): 2139–2148. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1745.
- FAO (1997). "The food system and factors affecting household food security and nutrition". Agriculture, food and nutrition for Africa: a resource book for teachers of agriculture. Rome: Agriculture and Consumer Protection Department. Retrieved 15 October 2013.
- Godfray, H. C. J.; Beddington, J. R.; Crute, I. R.; Haddad, L.; Lawrence, D.; Muir, J. F.; Pretty, J.; Robinson, S.; Thomas, S. M.; Toulmin, C. (28 January 2010). "Food Security: The Challenge of Feeding 9 Billion People". Science 327 (5967): 812–818. doi:10.1126/science.1185383.
- Food self-sufficiency rate fell below 40% in 2010 , Japan Times, Aug. 12, 2011
- Tweeten, Luther (1999). "The Economics of Global Food Security". Review of Agricultural Economics 21 (2): 473–488. Retrieved 15 October 2013.
- Ecker and Breisinger (2012). The Food Security System. Washington, D.D.: International Food Policy Research Institute. pp. 1–14.
- United Nations Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (1999). The right to adequate food. Geneva: United Nations.
- Garrett, J and Ruel, M (1999). Are Determinants of Rural and Urban Food Security and Nutritional Status Different? Some Insights from Mozambique. Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute. Retrieved 15 October 2013.
- "World Food Summit: Basic Information". Fas.usda.gov. February 22, 2005. Retrieved 2011-03-16.
- "Rome Declaration and Plan of Action". Fao.org. Retrieved 2011-03-16.
- Robert Fogel, The Escape from Hunger and Premature Death: 1700–2100, Cambridge University Press, 2004.
- Food and Agriculture Organization
- Patrick Webb and Beatrice Rogers, Addressing the "In" in Food Insecurity, United States Agency for International Development, Office of Food for Peace, Occasional Paper No. 1, Washington, D.C., 2003.
- "Water Scarcity Crossing National Borders". Earth-policy.org. September 27, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2011. [dead link]
- "India grows a grain crisis". Asia Times. July 21, 2006. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- "Outgrowing the Earth". Globalenvision.org. November 23, 2005. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- "The Food Bubble Economy". I-sis.org.uk. April 12, 2002. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- Global Water Shortages May Lead to Food Shortages-Aquifer Depletion. Greatlakesdirectory.org.
- "Conference on Water Scarcity in Africa: Issues and Challenges". Retrieved 18 March 2013.
- "Coping With Water Scarcity: Challenge of the 21st Century". Retrieved 18 March 2013.
- Felicity Lawrence (September 15, 2010). "How Peru's wells are being sucked dry by British love of asparagus | Environment". The Guardian (UK). Retrieved 2011-03-16.
- Lawrence, Felicity (September 15, 2010). "Big business clear winner in Peru's asparagus industry | Global development | guardian.co.uk". The Guardian (UK). Retrieved 2011-03-16.
- "The Earth Is Shrinking: Advancing Deserts and Rising Seas Squeezing Civilization". Earth-policy.org. Retrieved November 13, 2011. [dead link]
- Ian Sample in science correspondent (August 30, 2007). "Global food crisis looms as climate change and population growth strip fertile land". The Guardian (UK). Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- "Africa may be able to feed only 25% of its population by 2025". News.mongabay.com. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- Rich countries launch great land grab to safeguard food supply, The Guardian, November 22, 2008
- "Arable Land, the new gold rush : African and poor countries cautioned". En.afrik.com. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- "Futehally, Ilmas, The Geopolitics of Food, Virtue Science". Virtuescience.com. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- Harvey, Fiona. 2011. Extreme weather will strike as climate change takes hold, IPCC warns
- Strategic Foresight Group (March 2013). "Blue Peace for the Nile".
- Climate & Development Knowledge Network. 2012. Managing Climate Extremes and Disasters in the Agricultural Sector: Lessons from the IPCC SREX Report
- Big melt threatens millions, says UN[dead link]
- firstname.lastname@example.org (July 24, 2007). "Glaciers melting at alarming speed". People's Daily. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- "Ganges, Indus may not survive: climatologists". Rediff.com. December 31, 2004. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- Singh, Navin (November 10, 2004). "Himalaya glaciers melt unnoticed". BBC News. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- "Glaciers Are Melting Faster Than Expected, UN Reports". ScienceDaily. March 17, 2008. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- "Issues In Food Security" (PDF). Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- Loading the Climate Dice July 22, 2012 Paul Krugman
- Impacts of Climate Change on Food Security[dead link]
- "Issues In Climate Change" (PDF). Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- Robin McKie and Xan Rice (April 22, 2007). "Millions face famine as crop disease rages". The Guardian (UK). Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- "Billions at risk from wheat super-blight". New Scientist Magazine (2598): 6–7. April 3, 2007. Retrieved 2007-04-19.
- "IRAN: Killer fungus threatens wheat production in western areas". Alertnet.org. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- Hanan Sela, University of Haifa, Israel See DIVERSEEDS short video
- Vincent HA, Wiersema J, Dobbie SL, Kell SP, Fielder H, Castañeda Alvarez NP, Guarino L, Eastwood R, Leόn B, Maxted N. 2012. A prioritised crop wild relative inventory to help underpin global food security. (in preparation). http://www.cwrdiversity.org/checklist/genepool-details.php?id%5b%5d=22&id%5b%5d=4184&id%5b%5d=578&
- http://www.isaaa.org/ ISAAA Briefs 34-2005: Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2005
- ISAAA official website: Donor Support Groups http://www.isaaa.org/inbrief/donors/default.asp
- GM Watch 2009: New briefing on ISAAA and its global status reports http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/1-test/10553-new-briefing-on-isaaa-and-its-global-status-reports
- Fred Cuny–Famine, Conflict, and Response: a Basic Guide; Kumarian Press, 1999.
- "Want to feed nine billion?" http://www.foodsecurity.ac.uk/blog/index.php/2013/06/want-to-feed-nine-billion/ Retrieved 25 August 2013
- Eating Fossil Fuels. EnergyBulletin.net[dead link]
- "Peak Oil: the threat to our food security". Soilassociation.org. Retrieved November 13, 2011. [dead link]
- The Oil Drum: Europe. "Meets Peak Oil". Europe.theoildrum.com. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- "Genetic Pollution: The Great Genetic Scandal";
- Pollan, Michael (December 9, 2001). "The year in ideas: A TO Z.; Genetic Pollution; By Michael Pollan, The New York Times, December 9, 2001". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-06-21.
- "Dangerous Liaisons? When Cultivated Plants Mate with Their Wild Relatives; by Norman C. Ellstrand; The Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003; 268 pp. hardcover, $ 65; ISBN 0-8018-7405-X. Book Reviewed in: Hybrids abounding; Nature Biotechnology 22, 29–30 (2004); Reviewed by: Steven H Strauss & Stephen P DiFazio; 1 Steve Strauss is in the Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-5752, USA. steve.strauss(a)oregonstate.edu; 2 Steve DiFazio is at Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Bldg. 1059, PO Box 2008, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831-6422 USA. difazios(a)ornl.gov". Nature.com. January 1, 2004. doi:10.1038/nbt0104-29. Retrieved 2009-06-21.
- ""Genetic pollution: Uncontrolled spread of genetic information (frequently referring to transgenes) into the genomes of organisms in which such genes are not present in nature." Zaid, A. et al. 1999. Glossary of biotechnology and genetic engineering. FAO Research and Technology Paper No. 7. ISBN 92-5-104369-8". Fao.org. Retrieved 2009-06-21.
- "Definition: Genetic pollution"[dead link]: "Uncontrolled escape of genetic information (frequently referring to products of genetic engineering) into the genomes of organisms in the environment where those genes never existed before." Searchable Biotechnology Dictionary. University of Minnesota., 
- "The many facets of pollution". University of Bologna. Jul 20, 2005. Retrieved 2009-06-21. "Genetic pollution: Living organisms can also be defined as pollutants, when a non-indigenous species (plant or animal) enters a habitat and modifies the existing equilibrium among the organisms of the affected ecosystem (sea, lake, river). Non-indigenous, including transgenic species (GMOs), may bring about a particular version of pollution in the vegetable kingdom: so-called genetic pollution. This term refers to the uncontrolled diffusion of genes (or transgenes) into genomes of plants of the same type or even unrelated species where such genes are not present in nature. For example, a grass modified to resist herbicides could pollinate conventional grass many miles away, creating weeds immune to the most widely used weed-killer, with obvious consequences for crops. Genetic pollution is at the basis of the debate on the use of GMOs in agriculture."
- "Dispute over food security". Inwent.org. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- Mekong nations to form rice price-fixing cartel Radio Australia, April 30, 2008[dead link]
- Post|May 1, 2008|PM floats idea of five-nation rice cartel[dead link]
- Welcome to OREC – Rice for Life. Orecinternational.org (March 19, 2012).
- "Thailand drops idea for rice cartel". The New York Times. May 6, 2008.
- Charles J. Hanley (October 23, 2008). "`We blew it' on global food, says Bill Clinton". CBS News. Associated Press. Retrieved 2013-04-01.
- Nicholas Tarling (Ed.) The Cambridge History of SouthEast Asia Vol.II Part 1 pp139-40
- UNICEF UK News:: News item:: The tragic consequences of climate change for the world’s children:: April 29, 2008 00:00[dead link]
- The Washington Post, 2009 Nov 17, "America's Economic Pain Brings Hunger Pangs: USDA Report on Access to Food 'Unsettling,' Obama Says," http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/16/AR2009111601598.html?hpid=topnews
- "Individual, Family and Neighborhood Characteristics and Children’s Food Insecurity". JournalistsResource.org. Retrieved April 13, 2012
- Kimbro, Rachel T.; Denney, Justin T.; Panchang, Sarita (2012). "Individual, Family and Neighborhood Characteristics and Children’s Food Insecurity". Journal of Applied Research on Children 3.
- , World Food Programme Gender Policy Report. Rome, 2009.
- , The Hunger Project: Facts about Hunger and Poverty.
- Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook, World Food Bank, Food and Agriculture Organization, and International Fund for Agricultural Development (2009)
-  Center for Women's Global Leadership: The Right to Food, Gender Equality, and Economic Policy.
- , Climate Change, Agriculture, and Food Security. Global Conference On Women In Agriculture, 2012.
- [dead link], USAID Feed the Future Guide (May 2010)
- The Right to Food, Gender Equality and Economic Policy. Center for Women's Global Leadership, page 7-8. September 16–17, 2011
- Women’s Land Link Africa. (2010). "The Impact of National Land Policy and Land Reform On Women in Uganda". WLLA. 1–8.
- "Women Farmers: Change and Development Agents". 2011. Prepared by World Rural Forum with Alexandra Spieldoch for World Conference on Family Farming.
- Agarwal, Bina (1994). A field of one's own: gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge University Press. p. 576. ISBN 052141682, 0521429269. Retrieved 2012-02-14.
- Women Feeding Cities: Mainstreaming Gender in Urban Agriculture and Food Security (2009) Practical Action Publishing, page 26.
- Women and Land in Africa: Culture, Religion, and Realizing Women's Rights (2003) David Phillip Publishers, page 26.
-  Gender in Agriculture Sourcebook: "Investing in Women as Drivers of Agricultural Growth." 2009. World Bank, FAO, and IFAD.
- Land law#Land rights and women Land Rights and Women, Wikipedia.
- Gender pay gap Gender Pay Gap, Wikipedia.
-  Growing a Better Future Report. 2011. Oxfam International.
- [dead link], USAID: Empowering Women to Feed and Lead (November/December, 2001).
- , Center for Women's Global Leadership: The Right to Food, Gender Equality, and Economic Policy.
- , Cape Town's Women Take the Lead in Farm-Focused Social Enterprise.
- Groundbreaking Index Launched to Empower Women and Fight Hunger, USAID Press Release, February 27, 2012. http://www.usaid.gov/press/releases/2012/pr120227.html
- , Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Index.
- The State of Food Insecurity in the World 2003[dead link]
- Pablo Stafforini. "Peter Singer advocating population control". Utilitarian.net. Retrieved November 13, 2011.
- USAID – Food Security[dead link]
- Claudio O. Delang (2006). "The role of wild food plants in poverty alleviation and biodiversity conservation in tropical countries". Progress in Development Studies 6 (4): 275–286. doi:10.1191/1464993406ps143oa.
- Molden, D. (Ed). Water for food, Water for life: A Comprehensive Assessment of Water Management in Agriculture. Earthscan/IWMI, 2007.
- Agriculture, Food Security, Nutrition and the Millennium Development Goals, 2003–2004 IFPRI Annual Report Essay by Joachim von Braun, M. S. Swaminathan, and Mark W. Rosegrant
- (PDF). doi:10.1016/j.jada.2004.12.015 http://communities.mysudbury.ca/Sites/foodsecurity/Food%20Security%20Reports/Evidence%20Based%20Food%20Security%20Strategies.pdf. Retrieved 2011-03-16. Missing or empty
- Cox, P. G., S. Mak, G. C. Jahn, and S. Mot. 2001. Impact of technologies on food security and poverty alleviation in Cambodia: designing research processes. pp. 677–684 In S. Peng and B. Hardy [eds.] "Rice Research for Food Security and Poverty Alleviation." Proceeding the International Rice Research Conference, March 31, – April 3, 2000, Los Baños, Philippines: International Rice Research Institute. 692 p.
- Singer, H. W. (1997). A global view of food security. Agriculture + Rural Development, 4: 3–6. Technical Center for Agricultural and Rural Development (CTA).
- von Braun, Joachim; Swaminathan, M. S.; Rosegrant, Mark W. 2004. Agriculture, food security, nutrition and the Millennium Development Goals (Annual Report Essay) Washington, D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)
- Biotechnology, Agriculture, and Food Security in Southern Africa edited by Steven Were Omamo and Klaus von Grebmer (2005) (Brief and Book available)
- Brown ME, Funk CC (February 2008). "Climate. Food security under climate change". Science 319 (5863): 580–1. doi:10.1126/science.1154102. PMID 18239116. .
- Lobell DB, Burke MB, Tebaldi C, Mastrandrea MD, Falcon WP, Naylor RL (February 2008). "Prioritizing climate change adaptation needs for food security in 2030". Science 319 (5863): 607–10. doi:10.1126/science.1152339. PMID 18239122.
- Introduction to the Basic Concepts of Food Security EC-FAO Food Security Programme (2008) Practical Guide Series
- The environmental food crisis A study done by the UN on feeding the world population (2009)
- Climate change: Impact on agriculture and costs of adaptation A report by the International Food Policy Research Institute that presents research results that quantify the impacts of climate change, assesses the consequences for food security, and estimates the investments that would offset the negative consequences for human well-being.
- Moseley, W.G. and B.I. Logan. 2005. "Food Security." In: Wisner, B., C. Toulmin and R. Chitiga (eds). Toward a New Map of Africa. London: Earthscan Publications. Pp. 133–152.
- Food Security Communications Toolkit from the Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN
- Nord, Mark. "Struggling To Feed the Family: What Does It Mean To Be Food Insecure?".
- Food Insecurity, a special issue on the topic by the Journal of Applied Research on Children. (2012)
- FAO Food Security Statistics
- World Summit on Food Security 2009
- The World Food Summit 1996
- The Global Food Security and Nutrition Forum (FSN Forum)
- Food security e-learning courses from FAO
- e-learning about Right to Food
- Global Food Security Threatened by Corporate Land Grabs in Poor Countries – video report by Democracy Now!
- Video: Food Security and Its Impact on International Development and HIV Reduction (October 16, 2006) A Woodrow Wilson Center event featuring Jordan Dey, UNFP; William Noble, Africare; and Suneetha Kadiyala, IFPRI
- CSRL, Iowa State's cooperative aid program
- Can China Feed Itself? A System for Evaluation of Policy Options.
- Food Security Communications Toolkit from FAO
- Food Security: Center for Global Studies at the University of Illinois