Showing posts with label capital institute. Show all posts
Showing posts with label capital institute. Show all posts

Sunday, 31 May 2015

Beyond capitalism and socialism: could a new economic approach save the planet?


A holistic approach to the economy is necessary to avoid social, environmental and economic collapse, according to a new report by the Capital Institute/The Guardian

Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Transfinancial_Economics
 
water pollution
Dead fish clog the Rodrigo de Freitas lake in Rio de Janiero, Brazil. Scientists claim that the fish were starved of oxygen because of pollution. A holistic approach would look closely at the environmental impacts - such as a fish die-off - of economic activities Photograph: Fabio Teixeira/Pacific/Barcroft
The non-partisan think tank argues that both systems are unsustainable, even if flawlessly executed, and that economists need to look to the “hard science of holism” to debunk outdated views held by both the left and the right.
Jan Smuts, who coined the term “holism” in his 1926 book, Holism and Evolution, defined it as the “tendency in nature to form wholes that are greater than the sum of the parts”. For example, in the case of a plant, the whole organism is more than a collection of leaves, stems and roots. Focusing too closely on each of these parts, the theory argues, could get in the way of understanding the organism as a whole.            
Viewed through this perspective, the capitalist tendency to isolate an economic process from its antecedents and effects is fundamentally flawed. The Capital Institute, created by former JP Morgan managing director John Fullerton, says that society’s economic worldview has relied on breaking complex systems down into simpler parts in order to understand and manage them.
For example, this traditional economic view might view automobile manufacturing separately from the mineral mining, petroleum production and workers on which it relies. Moreover, this view might also not acknowledge the impact that automobile manufacturing has on the environment, politics and economics of an area. Holism, on the other hand, would view the entire chain of cause and effect that leads to – and away from – automobile manufacturing.
The Capital Institute report, titled Regenerative Capitalism, emphasizes that the world economic system is closely related to, and dependent upon, the environment. “The failure of modern economic theory to acknowledge this reality has had profound consequences, not the least of which is global climate change,” it says.

A long chain of cause and effects

According to the Capital Institute, the consequences of this economic worldview are vast and far reaching, encompassing a host of challenges that range from climate change to political instability.
For example, the current capitalist system has created extreme levels of inequality, the report says. This, in turn, has led to a host of ills, including worker abuse, sexism, economic stagnation and more. It could even be considered partly responsible for the rise of terrorism around the world, the report claims. In other words, this inequality has become a threat to the very system that is creating it. Without radical change, the report warns, “the current mainstream capitalist system is under existential threat”.
What is needed now, the Capital Institute argues, is a new systems-based mindset built around the idea of a regenerative economy, “which recognizes that the proper functioning of complex wholes, like an economy, cannot be understood without the ongoing, dynamic relationships among parts that give rise to greater wholes”.
In practice, this might lead to close analysis of supply chains, investigations of the effects of water use, circular economy initiatives, community economic development work or a host of other sustainability efforts.
While some people associate holistic thinking with mystics or hippies, the worldview is borne out in ways that are measurable, precise and empirical. “Universal principles and patterns of systemic health and development actually do exist, and are known to guide behavior in living systems from bacteria to human beings,” the report says.
Holism also can be used to study “nonliving systems from hurricanes to transportation systems and the internet; and societal systems including monetary systems”. Not surprisingly, the theory underlies other scientific and social tools, such as system theory and chaos theory.

A radical shift

This holistic approach flies in the face of a great deal of long-held beliefs. For example, while decision makers usually focus on finding a single ‘right’ answer, holism focuses on finding balanced answers that address seemingly contradictory goals like efficiency and resilience, collaboration and competition, and diversity and coherence. Taken from this perspective, holism wouldn’t approach global economics from a capitalism-or-socialism perspective, but rather from a capitalism-and-socialism perspective.
The report emphasizes the importance of innovation and adaptability over rigid structures and belief systems. It also embraces diversity, suggesting that, instead of trying to find a globalized one-size-fits-all approach to change, it is vital to recognize that each community consists of a “mosaic of peoples, traditions, beliefs, and institutions uniquely shaped by long term pressures of geology, human history, culture, local environment, and changing human needs”.
Ultimately, the report argues, a holistic perspective emphasizes that we are all connected to one another and to the planet, and therefore need to recognize that damaging any part of that web could end up harming every other part.
In business terms, what would this sort of revolutionary shift in business look like? The Capital Institute, which presented a white paper at Yale University’s Center for Business and the Environment on Tuesday, says innovators and entrepreneurs around the world are already responsible for thousands of sustainability initiatives and movements that are helping to re-imagine capitalism, such as social enterprises, B Corps, impact investing, slow food and localism.
The report says that, while some critics view these as “disconnected feel-good activities outside the mainstream capitalist system”, they are, in fact, “in alignment with the regenerative economy framework”. Collectively, it claims, “these forces provide living proof that a new regenerative economy is emergent”.
Beyond movements of change, the institute points to a number of individual initiatives that show how the world could change for the better. For example, Mexico’s Grupo Ecologico has worked to fund impoverished small farmers and ranchers, giving them the economic freedom to preserve and regenerate their own land.
Similarly, Australia’s Bendigo Community Bank splits its net income with local community enterprises. It directs a portion of community branch earnings toward grant making, giving local leaders the opportunity to become active players in their communities.
Community development is also a primary concern for Chicago’s Manufacturing Renaissance, which is forging unusual partnerships among government, labour unions, educators, the private sector, and civil society to create programs that support the region’s advanced manufacturing sectors.
Fullerton says there is great potential ahead if society can change its collective mindset: “This is a monumental challenge that holds the promise of uniting our generation in a shared purpose. We now have a more rigorous understanding of what makes human networks healthy – this alone constitutes an amazing opportunity. It is time to act. Our actions, now, will most certainly define the nobility of our lives and our legacy. This is the great work of our time.”
The rethinking prosperity hub is sponsored by DNV GL. All content is editorially independent except for pieces labelled “brought to you by”. Find out more here.

Thursday, 7 February 2013

The Third Millennium Economy (3ME)

The Third Millennium Economy (3ME)



Third Millennium Economy

Click here to download the paper.
Economics, Finance, Governance, and Ethics for the Anthropocene
We are pleased to present this working paper of the Third Millennium Economy Project: Economics, Finance, Governance, and Ethics for the Anthropocene. Released in advance of the Rio +20 United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, the paper is an effort to build consenus around an alternative to the green economy thinking pervasive in the global negotiations around our ecological crises. The authors of the report make the case for a new economics, finance, governance, and ethics that are grounded in a respect for all life and based on the findings of modern planetary science.
Also, importantly, the report is intended to be a living document and only the first step in a process that brings together scholars from around the world to engage in assessing our current situation and envisioning the path to a flourishing future for life on Earth. We want to hear your thoughts. (Submit all comments to Peter Brown at 3ME@capitalinstitute.org.)
The Third Millennium Economy Project:
The Third Millennium Economy project is an initiative of the Capital Lab. It is intended to construct a roadmap of where we are and where we need to get to in order to transition to a truly sustainable economic system. Unlike many conversations about sustainable economics, this initiative is grounded in the scientific understanding of the world's leading ecologists about the planetary boundaries that a sustainable economy needs to respect. Capital Institute is honored to be a contributor to and sponsor of this important work.
A profound cognitive transition is taking place as we come to grips with the implications of the ecological boundaries of our finite planet. We must shift from the reductionist world view of the Enlightenment to a new systemic world view that understands reality as complex, interdependent systems in which the whole cannot be understood as the sum of the parts. The implications for the human economy, its institutions, the financial system that fuels it, our systems of governance, and indeed our sense of what it means to live a good life are all on the table for examination.
The Third Millennium Economy Steering Committee includes: Peter Brown, Graciela Chichilnisky, John Fullerton, Tim Jackson, William Rees, Juliet Schor, Gus Speth, and Peter Victor.
This project is funded by generous grant from the V. Kann Rasmussen Foundation
 
 
 
 
 
Some comment by Hazel Henderson
 
Avatar
Hazel Henderson

Great to read this draft and see so many of our Canadian friends riding to the rescue !
I remember while I was a full time science policy wonk in Washington ( NSF , OTA and Nat. Academy of engineering from 1974-1980 ) I was able to bring the great reports of Canada's Science Council, particularly those on The Conserver Society to the attention of members of the US Congress .
Today, sadly the US is still struggling to overcome the defunct ideologies of economics and the theory-induced blindness promoted by the Chicago School. My later work with the Canadian National Roundtable on the Economy and Environment enabled me to present our Calvert-Henderson Quality of Life Indicators there in Toronto in 2000,( the first systems approach to measuring national " progress' beyond macroeconomics , using the now familiar web-based " dashboard " with multi-disciplinary indicators unbundled for public understanding). I am currently on the Advisory Board of the Canadian Index of Wellbeing , which might be mentioned, as it is a far more rigorous approach than the rash of fashionable but culturally-biased" happiness " approaches . So I still worry that trying to adapt macroeconomic modelling to the whole systems transition we are undergoing, will continue to be a waste of time and money.
.
The chapter by John Fullerton on Finance is welcome , since economics has managed to ignore the role of finance for too long. I would like more discussion of the fatal flaws of compound interest , which I discussed in my Politics of the Solar Age ( 1981, 1986) as a dangerous mathematical abstraction counter to the Second Law of Thermodynamics , with hugely -destructive effects on ecosystems, beyond the issue of discount rates. Also, the issue of the politics of money-creation and credit allocation as the flywheel of the inequality and ecological devastation today needs to be covered. Nor did I find any solid policy proposals already gaining traction, , e.g. financial transaction taxes , such as we of the WorldShift Council proposed to the G-20 in Mexico June 19th. However , I'm happy John has taken up this reform , as well as that of public banking ( see the Public Banking Institute on whose advisory Board I serve www.publicbankinginstitute.org ). I also hope you can add a reference to the Ethical Markets- Capital Institute Statement crafted here in 2010 on TRANSFORMING FINANCE , and join me, John, Graciela Chichilnisky and all the other global experts who joined us in signing it at www.transformingfinance.net
Other issues , such as the proposals for countries to use Chapter 9 for declaring bankruptcy , and other reforms of the international agencies , the UN , the IFIs which I discussed in my Beyond Globalization ,
( 1999) and offered by many others since then , including those of my erstwhile currency trader friend T. Ross Jackson ( another Canadian ! ) in his OCCUPY WORLD STREET ( 2012) , to which I wrote the Foreword , might also be referenced .
And references to the work of Kenneth Boulding , Nicholas Georgescu -Roegen , Barbara Ward and E.F. Schumacher , all my dear departed friends , as well as Joan Robinson , who won the debate of the Two Cambridges by pointing out that those at Harvard could not define " capital " ! This would be a nice gesture acknowledging that we all stand on the shoulders of these earlier pioneers