It is claimed that Abraham Lincoln issued Greenbacks which were United State Notes that largely financed the success of the American Civil War rather than relying on borrowing from banks, and similiar sources . RS
Large-sized Series of 1880 United States Notes; the $20 note displays Alexander Hamilton and a red scalloped seal, and the $10 Daniel Webster and a large red spiked seal
A
United States Note, also known as a
Legal Tender Note, is a type of
paper money that was issued from 1862 to 1971 in the U.S. Having been current for over 100 years, they were issued for longer than any other form of U.S. paper money. They were known popularly as "
greenbacks" in their heyday, a name inherited from the
Demand Notes that they replaced in 1862. Often called Legal Tender Notes, they were called United States Notes by the First Legal Tender Act, which authorized them as a form of
fiat currency. During the 1860s the so-called
second obligation on the reverse of the notes stated:
[1]
This Note is Legal Tender for All Debts Public and Private Except Duties On Imports And Interest On The Public Debt; And Is Redeemable In Payment Of All Loans Made To The United States.
They were originally issued directly into circulation by the
U.S. Treasury to pay expenses incurred by the
Union during the
American Civil War. Over the next century, the legislation governing these notes was modified many times and numerous versions have been issued by the Treasury.
United States Notes that were issued in the
large-size format, before 1929, differ dramatically in appearance when compared to modern American currency, but those issued in the small-size format, starting in 1929, are very similar to contemporary
Federal Reserve Notes with the highly visible distinction of having red
U.S. Treasury Seals and
serial numbers in place of green ones.
Existing United States Notes remain valid currency in the United States. However, since no United States Notes have been issued since January 1971, they are vanishingly rare in circulation.
[edit] History
[edit] Demand Notes
Comparison of a $5 Demand Note (upper image) and an 1862 issue $5 United States Note (lower image). Note the removal of the words "On Demand" and of the phrase "Receivable in Payment of All Public Dues". Also note the Treasury Seal added to the United States Note.
During 1861, the opening year of the American Civil War, the expenses incurred by the Union Government far outstripped its limited revenues from taxation, and borrowing was the main vehicle for financing the war. The Act of July 17, 1861
[2] authorized
Secretary of the Treasury Salmon P. Chase to raise money via the issuance of $50,000,000 in
Treasury Notes payable on demand.
[3] These
Demand Notes were paid out to creditors directly and used to meet the payroll of soldiers in the field. While issued within the legal framework of Treasury Note Debt, the Demand Notes were intended to circulate as currency and were of the same size as and, in appearance, closely resembled banknotes.
[4] In December 1861, economic conditions deteriorated and a
suspension of specie payment led the government to cease redeeming the Demand Notes in coin.
[edit] The Legal Tender Acts
The beginning of 1862 found the Union's expenses mounting, and the government was having trouble funding the escalating war. U.S. Demand Notes—which were used, among other things, to pay Union soldiers—were unredeemable, and the value of the notes began to deteriorate. On January 16, 1862, in a private meeting with President Lincoln,
Edmund Dick Taylor advised him to issue greenbacks as legal tender.
[5][6] Congressman and
Buffalo banker
Elbridge G. Spaulding prepared a bill, based on the Free Banking Law of New York, that eventually became the
National Banking Act of 1863.
[7] Recognizing, however, that his proposal would take many months to pass Congress, in early February Spaulding introduced another bill to permit the U.S. Treasury to issue $150 million in notes as legal tender.
[8] This caused tremendous controversy in Congress, as hitherto the Constitution had been interpreted as not granting the government the power to issue a paper currency. "The bill before us is a war measure, a measure of
necessity, and not of choice," Spaulding argued before the House, adding, "These are extraordinary times, and extraordinary measures must be resorted to in order to save our Government, and preserve our nationality." Spaulding justified the action as a "
necessary means of carrying into execution the powers granted in the Constitution 'to raise and
support armies,' and 'to provide and
maintain a navy.'”
[9] Despite strong opposition, President Lincoln signed the
First Legal Tender Act,
[10] enacted February 25, 1862, into law, authorizing the issuance of United States Notes as a
legal tender—the paper currency soon to be known as "greenbacks".
Initially, the emission was limited to $150,000,000 total face value between the new Legal Tender Notes and the existing Demand Notes. The Act also called for the new notes to be used to replace the Demand Notes as soon as practical. The Demand Notes had been issued in denominations of
$5,
$10, and
$20, and these were replaced by United States Notes nearly identical in appearance on the obverse. In addition, notes of entirely new design were introduced in denominations of
$50,
$100,
$500 and $1000. The Demand Notes' printed promise of payment "On Demand" was removed and the statement "This Note is a Legal Tender" was added.
A political cartoon from the 1864 election depicting
Secretary Fessenden of the Lincoln administration running "Chase's Mill" at left to flood the country with Greenbacks
Legal tender status guaranteed that creditors would have to accept the notes despite the fact that they were not backed by gold, bank deposits, or government reserves, and bore no interest. However, the First Legal Tender Act did not make the notes an
unlimited legal tender as they could not be used by merchants to pay customs duties on imports and could not be used by the government to pay interest on its bonds. The Act did provide that the notes be receivable by the government for short term deposits at 5% interest, and for the purchase of 6% interest 20-year bonds at par. The rationale for these terms was that the Union government would preserve its credit-worthiness by supporting the value of its bonds by paying their interest in gold. Early in the war, customs duties were a large part of government tax revenue and by making these payable in gold, the government would generate the coin necessary to make the interest payments on the bonds. Lastly, by making the bonds available for purchase at par in United States Notes, the value of the latter would be supported as well.
[3] The limitations to the legal tender status were quite controversial.
Thaddeus Stevens, the Chairman of the House of Representatives Committee of Ways and Means, which had authored an earlier version of the Legal Tender Act that would have made United States Notes a legal tender for
all debts, denounced the exceptions, calling the new bill "mischievous" because it made United States Notes an intentionally depreciated currency for the masses, while the banks who loaned to the government got "sound money" in gold. This controversy would continue until the removal of the exceptions in 1933.
In the First Legal Tender Act, Congress limited the Treasury's emission of United States Notes to $150,000,000; however, by 1863, the
Second Legal Tender Act,
[11] enacted July 11, 1862, a Joint Resolution of Congress,
[12] and the
Third Legal Tender Act,
[13] enacted March 3, 1863, had expanded the limit to $450,000,000, the option to exchange the notes for United States bonds at par had been revoked, and notes of
$1 and
$2 denominations had been introduced as the appearance of fiat currency had
driven even silver coinage out of circulation. As a result of this
inflation, the greenback went on to trade at a substantial discount from gold, which prompted Congress to pass the short-lived
Anti-gold futures act of 1864, which was soon repealed after it seemed to accelerate the decline of the greenback.
The largest amount of greenbacks outstanding at any one time was calculated as $447,300,203.10.
[14] The Union's reliance on expanding the circulation of greenbacks eventually ended with the emission of
Interest Bearing and
Compound Interest Treasury Notes, and the passage of the
National Banking Act. However, the end of the war found the greenbacks trading for only roughly half of their nominal value in gold.
[3]
[edit] Post Civil War
At the end of the Civil War, some economists, such as
Henry Charles Carey, argued for building on the precedent of non-debt-based fiat money and making the greenback system permanent.
[15] However,
Secretary of the Treasury McCulloch argued that the Legal Tender Acts had been war measures, and that the United States should soon reverse them and return to the
gold standard. The
House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to endorse the Secretary's view.
[16] With an eventual return to gold convertibility in mind, the Funding Act of April 12, 1866
[17] was passed, authorizing McCulloch to retire $10 million of the Greenbacks within six months and up to $4 million per month thereafter. This he proceeded to do until only $356,000,000 were outstanding in February 1868. By this point, the wartime economic boom was over, the crop harvest was poor, and a panic in Great Britain caused a recession and a sharp drop in prices in the United States.
[18] The contraction of the money supply was blamed for the deflationary effects, and led debtors to successfully agitate for a halt to the notes' retirement.
[19]
In the early 1870s, Treasury Secretaries
George S. Boutwell and
William Adams Richardson maintained that, though Congress had mandated $356,000,000 as the minimum Greenback circulation, the old Civil War statutes still authorized a maximum of $400,000,000
[20] - and thus they had at their discretion a "reserve" of $44,000,000. While the Senate Finance Committee under
John Sherman disagreed, being of the opinion that the $356,000,000 was a maximum as well as a minimum, no legislation was passed to assert the Committee's opinion. Starting in 1872, Boutwell and Richardson used the "reserve" to counteract seasonal demands for currency, and eventually expanded the circulation of the Greenbacks to $382,000,000 in response to the
Panic of 1873.
[21]
In June 1874, Congress officially capped the Greenback circulation at $382,000,000, and in January 1875, passed the
Specie Payment Resumption Act, which authorized a contraction in the circulation of Greenbacks towards a revised limit of $300,000,000, and required the government to redeem them for gold, on demand, after 1 January 1879. As a result, the currency strengthened and by April 1876, the notes were on par with silver coins which then began to re-emerge into circulation.
[22] On May 31, 1878, the contraction in the circulation was halted at $346,681,016 - a level which would be maintained for almost 100 years afterwards.
[23] While $346,681,016 was a significant figure at the time, it is now a very small fraction of the total currency in circulation in the United States. The year 1879 found
Sherman, now Secretary of the Treasury, in possession of sufficient specie to redeem notes as requested, but as this brought the value of the greenbacks into parity with gold for the first time since the Specie Suspension of December 1861, the public voluntarily accepted the greenbacks as part of the circulating medium.
[16]
While the United States Notes had been used as a form of debt issuance during the Civil War, afterwards they were used as a way of moderately influencing the money supply by the federal government - such as through the actions of Boutwell and Richardson. During the
Panic of 1907, President
Theodore Roosevelt attempted to increase liquidity in the markets by authorizing the Treasury to issue more Greenbacks, but the
Aldrich-Vreeland Act provided for the needed flexibility in the
National Bank Note supply instead. Eventually, the perceived need for an elastic currency was addressed with the
Federal Reserve Notes authorized by the
Federal Reserve Act, and pressure to alter the circulating quantity of United States Notes subsided.
Soon after
private ownership of gold was banned in 1933, all of the remaining types of circulating currency,
silver certificates,
Federal Reserve Notes, and United States Notes, were redeemable by individuals only for
silver. Eventually, even silver redemption stopped in 1965-68, during a time in which all U.S. currency (both coins and paper currency) was changed to
fiat currency. At this point for the general public, there was little to distinguish United States Notes from Federal Reserve Notes. As a result, the public circulation of United States Notes, which was then mainly in the form of $5 bills, was replaced with $5 Federal Reserve Notes, and the stock of United States Notes was mostly converted into $100 bills, which spent most of their time in bank vaults. No more United States Notes were put into circulation after January 21, 1971.
[24] In September 1994 the Riegle Improvement Act released the Treasury from its long-standing obligation to keep the notes in circulation and finally, in 1996, the Treasury announced that its stock of $100 United States Notes had been destroyed.
[25]
[edit] Comparison to Federal Reserve Notes
The United States Note was a
national currency whereas
Federal Reserve Notes are issued by the quasi-federal
Federal Reserve System.
[26] Both have been legal tender since the
gold recall of 1933. Both have been used in circulation as money in the same way. However, the issuing authority for them came from different statutes.
[24] United States Notes were created as fiat currency, in that the government has never categorically guaranteed to redeem them for precious metal - even though at times, such as after the specie resumption of 1879, federal officials were authorized to do so if requested. The difference between a United States Note and a Federal Reserve Note is that a United States Note represented a "bill of credit" and was inserted by the Treasury directly into circulation free of interest. Federal Reserve Notes are backed by debt purchased by the Federal Reserve, and thus generate
seigniorage, or interest, for the
Federal Reserve System, which serves as a lending parent to the Treasury and the public.
As the debt purchased by the Federal Reserve System to back its notes consists primarily of Treasury and
Government-sponsored enterprise debt,
[27] and because the seigniorage is largely remitted back to the Treasury as "interest on Federal Reserve Notes", the economics to the Treasury are comparable to issuing United States Notes. This stands in contrast to
National Bank Notes which allowed the issuing banks to privately retain the seigniorage as profit.
[edit] Characteristics
The first small size $1 United States Note issued (Smithsonian Institution).
The first small size $2 United States Note issued (Smithsonian Institution).
The first small size $5 United States Note issued (Smithsonian Institution).
Like all U.S. currency, United States Notes were produced in a
large sized format until 1929, at which point the notes' sizes were reduced to the small-size format of the present day.
The original large-sized Civil War issues were dated 1862 and 1863, and issued in denominations of $1, $2, $5, $10, $20, $50, $100, $500 and $1000.
[28] The United States Notes were dramatically redesigned for the Series of 1869, the so-called
Rainbow Notes. The notes were again redesigned in the Series of 1874, 1875 and 1878. The Series of 1878 included, for the first and last time, notes of $5,000 and $10,000 denominations. The final across-the-board redesign of the large-sized notes was the Series of 1880. Individual denominations were redesigned in 1901, 1907, 1917 and 1923.
On small-sized United States Notes, the
U.S. Treasury Seal and the
serial numbers are printed in red (contrasting with Federal Reserve Notes, where they usually appear in green). By the time the small-size format was adopted, the
Federal Reserve System was already in place and there was limited need for United States Notes. They were mainly issued in $2 and $5 denominations in the Series years of 1928, 1953, and 1963. There was a limited issue of $1 notes in the
Series of 1928, and an issue of $100 notes in the Series year of 1966, mainly to satisfy legacy legal requirements of maintaining the mandated quantity in circulation.
Section 5119(b)(2) of Title 31, United States Code, was amended by the Riegle Community Development and Regulatory Improvement Act of 1994 (Public Law 103-325) to read as follows: "The Secretary shall not be required to reissue United States currency notes upon redemption." This does not change the legal tender status of United States Notes nor does it require a recall of those notes already in circulation. This provision means that United States Notes are to be cancelled and destroyed but not reissued. This will eventually result in a decrease in the amount of these notes outstanding.
[29]
[edit] Public Debt of the United States
As of December 2012
[update], the U.S. Treasury calculates that $239 million in United States notes are in circulation, and excludes this amount from the
statutory debt limit of the United States. This amount excludes $25 million in United States Notes issued prior to July 1, 1929, determined pursuant to Act of June 30, 1961, 31 U.S.C. 5119, to have been destroyed or irretrievably lost.
[30]
[edit] Politics and controversy
The concept of replacing precious metals with fiat paper as the medium of exchange was contentious and attracted attention.
The
United States Congress had enacted the
Legal Tender Acts during the
U.S. Civil War when southern Democrats were
absent from the Congress, and thus their
Jacksonian hard money views were underrepresented. After the war, the
Supreme Court ruled on the
Legal Tender Cases to determine the constitutionality of the use of greenbacks. The 1870 case
Hepburn v. Griswold found unconstitutional the use of greenbacks when applied to debts established prior to the First
Legal Tender Act as the five
Democrats on the Court,
Nelson,
Grier,
Clifford,
Field, and
Chase, ruled against the Civil War legislation in a 5-3 decision. Secretary Chase had become
Chief Justice of the United States and a Democrat, and spearheaded the decision invalidating his own actions during the war. However, Grier retired from the Court, and
President Grant appointed two new
Republicans,
Strong and
Bradley, who joined the three sitting Republicans,
Swayne,
Miller, and
Davis, to reverse Hepburn, 5-4, in the 1871 cases
Knox v. Lee and
Parker v. Davis. In 1884, the Court, controlled 8-1 by Republicans, granted the federal government very broad power to issue Legal Tender paper through the case
Juilliard v. Greenman, with only the lone remaining Democrat, Field, dissenting.
[21]
The states in the far west stayed loyal to the Union, but also had hard money sympathies. During the specie suspension from 1862 to 1878 western states used the gold dollar as a unit of account whenever possible and accepted greenbacks at a discount wherever they could.
[3] The preferred forms of paper money were
gold certificates and
National Gold Bank Notes, the latter having been created specifically to address the desire for hard money in
California.
During the 1870s and 1880s, the
Greenback Party existed for the primary purpose of advocating an increased circulation of United States Notes as a way of creating inflation according to the
quantity theory of money. However, as the 1870s unfolded, the market price of silver fell with respect to gold, and inflationists found a new cause in the
Free Silver movement. Opposition to the resumption of specie convertibility of the Greenbacks in 1879 was accordingly muted.
[edit] See also
- ^ Friedberg, Arthur L. and Ira S., 2006, Paper Money of the United States, 18th Edition, Clifton, NJ, The Coin & Currency Institute, Inc. ISBN 0-87184-518-0
- ^ United States Congress. Act of July, 17 1861 Chapter Ⅴ. Washington D.C.: 1861
- ^ a b c d Mitchell, Wesley Clair, "A History of the Greenbacks With Special Reference To the Economic Consequences of Their Issue 1862-65", University of Chicago, Chicago, 1903.
- ^ Chittenden, L.E., Recollections of President Lincoln and His Administration, Harper & Brothers, New York, 1891.
- ^ Congressional Serial Set, Issue 2599, Volume 2. Report No. 380, U.S. G.P.O., 1888.
- ^ Abraham Lincoln's pen and voice, p. 404. Abraham Lincoln, George Mandeville Van Buren, 1890.
- ^ Heidler, D.S. & Heidler, J.T. (2000). Encyclopedia of the American Civil War: a political, social, and military history (p. 1168). New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
- ^ McPherson, J.M. (1988). Battle cry of freedom: the Civil War era (p.445). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- ^ Spaulding, E.G. (1869). History of the legal tender paper money issued during the great rebellion (p.29). Buffalo, NY: Express Printing.
- ^ ch. 33, 12 Stat. 345
- ^ ch. 142, 12 Stat. 532
- ^ United States Congress. Resolution of January 17, 1863, No. 9. Washington D.C.: 1863
- ^ ch. 73, 12 Stat. 709
- ^ Backus, Charles K., "The Contraction of the Currency", The Honest Money League of the Northwest, Chicago, Ill., 1878.
- ^ Carey, Henry Charles (March 1865) The Way to Outdo England Without Fighting Her
- ^ a b United States Notes, John Joseph Lalor, "Cyclopaedia of Political Science, Political Economy, and of the Political History of the United States", Rand McNally & Co, Chicago, 1881.
- ^ United States Congress. Act of April 12, 1866 Chapter XXXIII. Washington D.C.: 1866
- ^ Studenski, Paul; Krooss, Hermand Edward (1952). Financial History of the United States, New York, NY: McGraw-Hill. ISBN 1-58798-175-0.
- ^ The Greenback Question. Retrieved May 30, 2009.
- ^ While the three Legal Tender Acts had authorized $450,000,000 of notes, the Second Legal Tender Act, in taking the total from $150,000,000 to $300,000,000 had reserved $50,000,000 of the increase for the purpose of redeeming balances in a temporary deposit program. The Act of June 30, 1864, reiterated this limitation, and as the temporary loan program had ceased to exist, only $400,000,000 of the $450,000,000 ceiling were available.
- ^ a b Timberlake, Richard H.(1993). Monetary Policy in the United States: An Intellectual and Institutional History, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-80384-5.
- ^ Bowers, Q. David; David Sundman (2006). 100 GREATEST AMERICAN CURRENCY NOTES, Atlanta, Georgia: Whitman Publishing. ISBN 0-7948-2006-9.
- ^ The National Balance Sheet; It Includes $71,000,000 of Debits Which Might Well Be Dropped New York Times May 24, 1903, Sunday
- ^ a b U.S. Treasury - FAQ: Legal Tender Status
- ^ Hessler, Gene and Chambliss, Carlson (2006). The Comprehensive Catalog of U.S. Paper Money, 7th edition, Port Clinton, Ohio: BNR Press ISBN 0-931960-66-5.
- ^ "President John F.Kennedy, The Federal Reserve, and Executive Order 11110". The Final Call 15 (6). January 17, 1996. http://www.john-f-kennedy.net/executiveorder11110.htm.
- ^ Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Financial Statements of the Federal Reserve System, Combined Federal Reserve Banks as of December 31, 2011
- ^ Chronology of Large-Size Notes Retrieved June 6, 2009.
- ^ http://www.bep.treas.gov/historicallegislation.html
- ^ "Monthly Statement of the Public Debt of the United States". United States Treasury Department. 2012-12-31. http://www.treasurydirect.gov/govt/reports/pd/mspd/2012/opdm122012.pdf. Retrieved 2013-01-08.
[edit] Further reading
- Wesley Clair Mitchell, A History of the Greenbacks: With Special Reference to the Economic Consequences of Their Issue, 1862-65. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1903.
- Irwin Unger, The Greenback Era: A Social and Political History of American Finance, 1865-1879. (1965)
- Henry George, "On Greenbacks, Free Silver, and Free Banking," The Standard, December 14, 1889.
[edit] External links
[hide]
Obsolete United States currency and coinage
|
|---|
|
| Topics |
|
|---|
|
| Coins |
|
|---|
|
| Gold coins |
|
|---|
|
| Currency |
|
|---|
|
| Patterns |
|
|---|
|
Discussions of centralized planning in the West often take it for granted that the Soviet Union and similar social systems are the only ones with centralized planning. This is a basic (albeit ideological) confusion that results from the belief that markets and centralized planning are incompatible. This is not the case.
