Showing posts with label singularity university. Show all posts
Showing posts with label singularity university. Show all posts

Friday, 8 August 2014

The Creator Economy: Futurist Paul St affo On The New Business Epoch

Tech     FORBES
Blogger Ref http://www.p2pfoundation.net/Transfinancial_Economics


  
Paul Saffo is one of the world’s foremost professional seers, and certainly the most entertaining. A visiting professor at Stanford and co-founder of Discern, an investment analytics firm, he divines the shape of things to come by melding an incisive grasp of history and current trends with a keen imagination. And a sense of humor — he delivers his conclusions with a conversational shrug, as if to say, even the best futurists can’t say for sure what’s coming down the pike.
In an October 3 presentation at Singularity University, he outlines the epochal shift of our time: the transition from a producer economy to a creator economy. Saffo’s analysis is brilliant in its simplicity, and it can help businesses think about how to create value in a networked world.
At the turn of the century, he says, the US was preoccupied with overcoming scarcity. Industrial manufacturing drove the economy. The hero of this era was the VP of manufacturing, and his byword was efficiency. Result: a producer economy in which production lines and punch clocks kept workers at peak productivity. Henry Ford painted his famous Model T black because that color dried quickest, allowing him to deliver more units in less time. By World War II, the US industrial machine could turn out weapons at a prodigious rate, smothering enemies in a flood of armament.
Paul Saffo addresses the Singularity University Executive Program: Welcome to the creator economy.




When the war ended, manufacturers trained this tremendous productive capacity on the consumer market, and the consumer economy was born. This new mode overcame scarcity with a vengeance — in fact, US factories produced more than citizens could possibly buy. The hero became the VP of marketing, the wizard who could invent unnecessary products and convince the growing ranks of consumers to purchase them. (Can I interest anyone in the electric carving knife that’s boxed up in my parents’ attic?) Easy credit, falling production costs, and mass media, especially television with its tireless succession of pitchmen shifted economic growth into overdrive.
“I know the month the consumer economy ended,” Saffo says: November 2008, when the financial markets headed into a tailspin from which they show little sign of recovering. “It was more than an economic downturn, it was an inflection between two economies: Consumer and creator.”
The creator economy is essentially Web 2.0 and beyond. Individuals no longer simply consume but create value through their daily activities. This is the era of free services dispensed for the price of a registration, where businesses leverage huge quantities of data into profitable market insights. Google’s world-changing search service feels free, Saffo observes, but is isn’t. Every time you enter a search term, you’re paying in unique, individualized data that only you possess. In aggregate, these search terms make for a bonanza in advertising revenue. Interaction is central to this new paradigm, and the basic unit of interaction is: Put data in, get data out.
The key to prospering in the creator economy is to maximize interaction while reducing friction. Generally this means minimizing the amount of input required from users (i.e., Twitter’s counterintuitive 140-character limit). They need to contribute freely and naturally without having to think twice. In Saffo’s view, the creator economy will reward businesses that leverage tiny amounts of user input. “The companies that will be the biggest,” he says, “are the ones that harness the smallest quantum of creative activity.”

Monday, 7 January 2013

Singularity University

Singularity University

[ to email to University contact: http://singularityu.org on March 12, 2009 ]
[ to blog and quotes on Singularity University]

Bruce J. Klein

Dennis Blair has warned us all that a global economic failure could mimic the course of the period from 1918 through 1945 when fascism and world war grew out of the destruction of middle class economic security.

We have enormous investments in data gathering and analysis at the National Security Agency and the Central Intelligence Agency. We obviously might benefit from something like these agencies specifically charged with creating models for Congressional and Central Bank interventions in the global economy to prevent economic failures-- including slow-downs that robbed national and international optimism, of the type associated with Singularity and Futurism, and tended to allow fear and loathing of enemies to dominate significant portions of the global Zeitgeist.

I realize that extremely detailed data and plans would represent a hardening of the economic intellectual arteries similar to what happened to Marxist experiments in nation building that were so costly in blood and treasure in the 20th Century.

At the other extreme, very general theories, like those of Keynes and Abba Lerner, although helpful (perhaps beyond measure,) do not take full advantage of the revolutions in progress that promise exponential change, as explained by Ray Kurzweil and, I believe, that animate Singularity University.

It seems to me that your studies planned for ethics are not the only area that your University must cover. There is another area with which law and economics are deeply concerned: it is diagramming and explaining, to and for the body politic, the real economy that is untouched at the start of a recession, depression, or crash. The formal study of logistics covers this real economy.

Now it is not the real economy, per se, that Singularity U. must worry. Nor must you target the financial economy that governs economic growth of the real economy, when the latter is overcome by debt and misadventure.

Rather it is the connections .between the two that represent our golden opportunities to bring artificial intelligence into play--to help in reordering and restructuring legal, monetary and accounting facts on the ground, so to speak--in order to move rapidly from crash or bursting bubble, to renewed growth in the real economy, by applying new and better numbers to our failed financial accounts.

One starting place for this sort of study and incipient plan of action is Functional Finance, as advocated by Abba Lerner in mid-20th Century. Others are being discussed daily, especially today by Martin Wolf, in his focus on demand deficit disorder that must, in the end, involve quantitative analysis of the real economy to some degree.

Because all of the above is normally mired in ideological disagreement and vehement emotional attachment to the left or to the right, I believe there may be a place in your curricula for an off-campus virtual activity that tried to further define an Economic Intelligence Function or Demand Deficit Disorder cure, etc., or other revolutionary need-- more quantitative and qualitative than the metaphysics of ethics and good conduct in business and commercial law.

Were you to think favorably along these lines, I would like to participate in the virtual activity. Not as an investor or employee--but as a thinker.


john.gelles@gmail.org
indexed-savings@sbcglobal.net
www.ustaxreform.us
earn.wikispaces.com

virtual-recovery.wikispaces,com