Monday, 10 July 2017

Kenneth Arrow

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia/Blogger Ref/ Transfinancial Economics

Jump to: navigation, search
Kenneth Arrow
Kenneth Arrow, Stanford University.jpg
National Medal of Science award ceremony, 2004
BornKenneth Joseph Arrow
(1921-08-23)August 23, 1921
New York City, United States
DiedFebruary 21, 2017(2017-02-21) (aged 95)
Palo Alto, California, United States
NationalityAmerican
Websitehealthpolicy.fsi.stanford.edu/people/kenneth_j_arrow
InstitutionStanford University
FieldMicroeconomics
General equilibrium theory
Social choice theory
School or
tradition
Neoclassical economics
Alma materColumbia University
City College of New York
Doctoral
advisor
Harold Hotelling
Doctoral
students
John C. Harsanyi
Menahem E. Yaari (de)
Michael Bruno
Jan Kmenta
Karl Shell
A. Michael Spence
Jean-Jacques Laffont
Eric S. Maskin
Roger Myerson
Nancy Stokey[1]
John Geanakoplos
Andrea Prat[2]
Influences
Influenced
ContributionsGeneral equilibrium theory
Fundamental theorems of welfare economics
Arrow's impossibility theorem
Endogenous growth theory
Awards
Information at IDEAS / RePEc
Kenneth Joseph "Ken" Arrow (August 23, 1921 – February 21, 2017) was an American economist, writer, and political theorist. He was the joint winner of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics with John Hicks in 1972.
In economics, he was a figure in post-World War II neo-classical economic theory. Many of his former graduate students have gone on to win the Nobel Memorial Prize themselves. His most significant works are his contributions to social choice theory, notably "Arrow's impossibility theorem", and his work on general equilibrium analysis. He has also provided foundational work in many other areas of economics, including endogenous growth theory and the economics of information.


Education and early career[edit]

Arrow was born on August 23, 1921, in New York City. Arrow's mother, Lilian (Greenberg), was from Iași, Romania, and his father, Harry Arrow, was from nearby Podu Iloaiei.[5][6] The Arrow family were Romanian Jews.[7][8] His family was very supportive of his education.[9] Growing up during the Great Depression, he embraced socialism in his youth. He would later move away from socialism, but his views retained a left-leaning philosophy.[10]
He graduated from Townsend Harris High School and then earned a Bachelor's degree from the City College of New York in 1940 in mathematics, where he was a member of Sigma Phi Epsilon. He attended Columbia University, for his graduate studies. While there, he studied under Harold Hotelling, and was greatly influenced by him.[10] He received a Master's degree in 1941.[11] He served as a weather officer in the United States Army Air Forces from 1942–1946.[12]

Academic career[edit]

From 1946 to 1949 Arrow spent his time partly as a graduate student at Columbia and partly as a research associate at the Cowles Commission for Research in Economics at the University of Chicago. During that time he also held the rank of Assistant Professor in Economics at the University of Chicago and worked at the RAND Corporation in California. He left Chicago to take up the post of Acting Assistant Professor of Economics and Statistics at Stanford University. In 1951, he earned his Ph.D. from Columbia.[11] He served in the government on the staff of the Council of Economic Advisers in the 1960s with Robert Solow.[13] In 1968, he left Stanford for the position of Professor of Economics at Harvard University. It was during his tenure here that he received the Nobel Prize in Economics.[11]
Arrow returned to Stanford in 1979 and became the Joan Kenney Professor of Economics and Professor of Operations Research. He retired in 1991. As a Fulbright Distinguished Chair, in 1995 he taught Economics at the University of Siena. He was also a founding member of the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences and a member of the Science Board of Santa Fe Institute. At various stages in his career he was a Fellow of Churchill College, Cambridge.[11]
Five of his former students have gone on to become Nobel Prize winners. These include Eric Maskin, John Harsanyi, Michael Spence and Roger Myerson.[14] A collection of Arrow's papers is housed at the Rubenstein Library at Duke University.[15]

Arrow's impossibility theorem[edit]

Arrow's monograph Social Choice and Individual Values derives from his 1951 Ph.D. thesis.
"If we exclude the possibility of interpersonal comparisons of utility, then the only methods of passing from individual tastes to social preferences which will be satisfactory and which will be defined for a wide range of sets of individual orderings are either imposed or dictatorial."[16]
In what he named the General Impossibility Theorem, he theorized that it was impossible to formulate a social preference ordering that satisfies all of the following conditions:[17]
  1. Nondictatorship: The preferences of an individual should not become the group ranking without considering the preferences of others.
  2. Individual Sovereignty: each individual should be able to order the choices in any way and indicate ties
  3. Unanimity: If every individual prefers one choice to another, then the group ranking should do the same
  4. Freedom From Irrelevant Alternatives: If a choice is removed, then the others' order should not change
  5. Uniqueness of Group Rank: The method should yield the same result whenever applied to a set of preferences. The group ranking should be transitive.
The theorem has implications for welfare economics and theories of justice. It was extended by Amartya Sen to the liberal paradox which argued that given a status of "Minimal Liberty" there was no way to obtain Pareto optimality, nor to avoid the problem of social choice of neutral but unequal results.[17]

General equilibrium theory[edit]

Work by Arrow and Gérard Debreu and simultaneous work by Lionel McKenzie offered the first rigorous proofs of the existence of a market clearing equilibrium.[18] For this work and his other contributions, Debreu won the 1983 Nobel Prize in Economics.[19] Arrow went on to extend the model and its analysis to include uncertainty, the stability. His contributions to the general equilibrium theory were strongly influenced by Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations.[citation needed] Written in 1776, The Wealth of Nations is an examination of economic growth brought forward by the division of labor, by ensuring interdependence of individuals within society.[20]
In 1974, The American Economic Association published the paper written by Kenneth Arrow, General Economic Equilibrium: Purpose, Analytic Techniques, Collective Choice, where he states:
'“From the time of Adam Smith’s Wealth of Nations in 1776, one recurrent theme of economic analysis has been the remarkable degree of coherence among the vast numbers of individual and seemingly separate decisions about the buying and selling of commodities. In everyday, normal experience, there is something of a balance between the amounts of goods and services that some individuals want to supply and the amounts that other, different individuals want to sell. Would-be buyers ordinarily count correctly on being able to carry out their intentions, and would-be sellers do not ordinarily find themselves producing great amounts of goods that they cannot sell. This experience of balance indeed so widespread that it raises no intellectual disquiet among laymen; they take it so much for granted that they are not supposed to understand the mechanism by which it occurs.”'[21]

Fundamental theorems of welfare economics[edit]

In 1951, Arrow presented the first and second fundamental theorems of welfare economics and their proofs without requiring differentiability of utility, consumption, or technology, and including corner solutions.[22]

Endogenous-growth theory[edit]

Arrow was one of the precursors of endogenous growth theory, which seeks to explain the source of technical change, which is a key driver of economic growth. Until this theory came to prominence, technical change was assumed to occur exogenously – that is, it was assumed to occur outside economic activities, and was outside (exogenous) to common economic models. At the same time there was no economic explanation for why it occurred. Endogenous-growth theory provided standard economic reasons for why firms innovate, leading economists to think of innovation and technical change as determined by economic actors, that is endogenously to economic activities, and thus belong inside the model. Endogenous growth theory started with Paul Romer's 1986 paper,[23] borrowing from Arrow's 1962 "learning-by-doing" model which introduced a mechanism to eliminate diminishing returns in aggregate output.[24] A literature on this theory has developed subsequently to Arrow's work.[25]

Information economics[edit]

In other pioneering research, Arrow investigated the problems caused by asymmetric information in markets. In many transactions, one party (usually the seller) has more information about the product being sold than the other party. Asymmetric information creates incentives for the party with more information to cheat the party with less information; as a result, a number of market structures have developed, including warranties and third party authentication, which enable markets with asymmetric information to function. Arrow analysed this issue for medical care (a 1963 paper entitled "Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care", in the American Economic Review);[26] later researchers investigated many other markets, particularly second-hand assets, online auctions and insurance.

Awards and honors[edit]

Arrow was awarded the John Bates Clark Medal in 1957[27] and was elected a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1959.[28] He was the joint winner of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics with John Hicks in 1972 and the 1986 recipient of the von Neumann Theory Prize.[11] He was one of the recipients of the 2004 National Medal of Science, the nation's highest scientific honor, presented by President George W. Bush for his contributions to research on the problem of making decisions using imperfect information and his research on bearing risk.[4]
He has received honorary doctorates from the University of Chicago (1967), the University of Vienna (1971) the City University of New York (1972).[11] On June 2, 1995 he received an honorary doctorate from the Faculty of Social Sciences at Uppsala University, Sweden.[29] He was elected a Foreign Member of the Royal Society (ForMemRS) in 2006.[4]

Personal life and death[edit]

Arrow was a brother to the economist Anita Summers, uncle to economist and former Treasury Secretary and Harvard President Larry Summers, and brother-in-law of the late economists Robert Summers and Paul Samuelson.[30] In 1947, he married Selma Schweitzer who died in 2015; they had two children: David Michael and Andrew Seth.[11]
Arrow died in his Palo Alto, California home on February 21, 2017 at the age of 95.[30]

Publications[edit]

Reprinted as: Arrow, Kenneth J. (1963). Social choice and individual values (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN 9780300013641. 
Also available as: Arrow, Kenneth J.; Hurwicz, Leonid (1977). "Appendix: An optimality criterion for decision-making under ignorance". (online book). Cambridge Books Online: 461–72. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511752940.015. 
and as: Arrow, Kenneth J.; Hurwicz, Leonid (1977), "Appendix: An optimality criterion for decision-making under ignorance", in Arrow, Kenneth J.; Hurwicz, Leonid, Studies in resource allocation processes, Cambridge New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 461–72, ISBN 9780521215220 
Including: Arrow, Kenneth J. Price-quantity adjustments in multiple markets with rising demands, pp. 3–15.
Reprinted as: Arrow, Kenneth J. (1983b), "The organization of economic activity: issues pertinent to the choice of market versus non-market allocations", in Arrow, Kenneth J., Collected papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, volume 2: general equilibrium, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press, pp. 133–55, ISBN 9780674137615. 
Also reprinted as a pdf.
Reprinted as: Arrow, Kenneth J. (1983a), "Extended sympathy and the possibility of social choice", in Arrow, Kenneth J., Collected papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, volume 1: social Choice and justice, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press, ISBN 9780674137608. 
Arrow, Kenneth J. (1983a). Collected papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, volume 1: social Choice and justice. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press. ISBN 9780674137608. 
Arrow, Kenneth J. (1983b). Collected papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, volume 2: general equilibrium. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press. ISBN 9780674137615. 
Arrow, Kenneth J. (1984a). Collected papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, volume 3: individual choice under certainty and uncertainty. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press. ISBN 9780674137622. 
Arrow, Kenneth J. (1984b). Collected papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, volume 4: the economics of information. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press. ISBN 9780674137639. 
Arrow, Kenneth J. (1985a). Collected papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, volume 5: production and capital. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press. ISBN 9780674137776. 
Arrow, Kenneth J. (1985b). Collected papers of Kenneth J. Arrow, volume 6: applied economics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press. ISBN 9780674137783. 
Also available online as: Arrow, Kenneth J. (2008). "Arrow's theorem". The new Palgrave dictionary of economics online, (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230226203.0061. 
Also available online as: Arrow, Kenneth J. (2008). "Hotelling, Harold (1895–1973)". The new Palgrave dictionary of economics online, (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230226203.0747. 

See also[edit]

References[edit]

  1. Jump up ^ PROFILE: Nancy Stokey.(Accessed September 2016)
  2. Jump up ^ Prat's CV
  3. Jump up ^ "経済学発展に貢献 文化勲章の根岸隆氏". The Nikkei. 24 October 2014. Retrieved 14 November 2015. (in Japanese)
  4. ^ Jump up to: a b c "Professor Kenneth Arrow ForMemRS, elected 2006". London: Royal Society. Archived from the original on 2015-11-17. 
  5. Jump up ^ "Premiat Nobel cu origini românești, Doctor Honoris Causa al Universității "Al. I. Cuza" din Iași". Jurnalul.ro. Retrieved 1 November 2014. 
  6. Jump up ^ Arrow and the Foundations of the Theory of Economic Policy
  7. Jump up ^ Abu N.M. Wahid (2002). Frontiers of Economics: Nobel Laureates of the Twentieth Century. Greenwood Publishing. p. 5. ISBN 0-313-32073-X. 
  8. Jump up ^ Steven Pressman (1999). Fifty major economists: Business & Economics. Routledge Publishing. p. 177. ISBN 0-415-13480-3. 
  9. Jump up ^ "American Jewish Recipients of the Nobel Prize". Fau.edu. Retrieved 1 November 2014. 
  10. ^ Jump up to: a b "Econ Journal Watch – Ideological Profiles of the Economics Laureates". Econjwatch.org. Retrieved 1 November 2014. 
  11. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g "Kenneth J. Arrow – Biographical". Nobelprize.org. Retrieved 1 November 2014. 
  12. Jump up ^ "Kenneth J. Arrow, MA, PhD". Stanford University. Retrieved 1 November 2014. 
  13. Jump up ^ "American President". Millercenter.org. Archived from the original on 2 November 2014. Retrieved 1 November 2014. 
  14. Jump up ^ John B. Shoven. "Kenneth Arrow Contributions to Economics" (PDF). Siepr.stanford.edu. Retrieved 1 November 2014. 
  15. Jump up ^ "Kenneth J. Arrow Papers, 1939–2009.". Rubenstein Library, Duke University. 
  16. Jump up ^ Kenneth Arrow, "A Difficulty in the Concept of Social Welfare" (1950).
  17. ^ Jump up to: a b Morreau, Michael (1 January 2016). "Arrow's Theorem". The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. Retrieved February 25, 2017. 
  18. Jump up ^ Mas-Colell, Andreu; Whinston, Michael D.; Green, Jerry R. (1995). Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 691–93. ISBN 0-19-507340-1. 
  19. Jump up ^ "Gerard Debreu – Biographical". www.nobelprize.org. Retrieved February 25, 2017. 
  20. Jump up ^ Smith, Adam, and Andrew S. Skinner. The wealth of nations. London: Penguin Books, 1999. Print.
  21. Jump up ^ Arrow, Kenneth (1974). "General Economic Equilibrium: Purpose, Analytic Techniques, Collective Choice". American Economic Review. 64 (3): 253–72. JSTOR 1808881. 
  22. Jump up ^ "Kenneth Arrow (1921– )". Concise Encyclopedia of Economics. Liberty Fund. 2008. Retrieved 18 June 2017. 
  23. Jump up ^ Romer, Paul M. (1986). "Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth". Journal of Political Economy. 94 (5): 1002–37. JSTOR 1833190. 
  24. Jump up ^ Arrow, Kenneth J. (1962). "The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing". Review of Economic Studies. 29 (3): 155–73. JSTOR 2295952. 
  25. Jump up ^ Barro, Robert J.; Sala-i-Martin, Xavier (2004). Economic Growth (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press. pp. 212–20. ISBN 0-262-02553-1. 
  26. Jump up ^ "Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care" (PDF). 
  27. Jump up ^ "John Bates Clark Medal". American Economic Association. Retrieved February 25, 2017. 
  28. Jump up ^ "Book of Members, 1780–2010: Chapter A" (PDF). American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved 25 April 2011. 
  29. Jump up ^ Honorary Doctors of the Faculty of Social Sciences
  30. ^ Jump up to: a b Weinstein, Michael M. (2017-02-21). "Kenneth Arrow, Nobel-Winning Economist Whose Influence Spanned Decades, Dies at 95". New York Times. Retrieved 2017-02-21. 

External links[edit]

Doughnut Economics


Blogger Ref/ Transfinancial Economics


* Book: Doughnut Economics: seven ways to think like a 21st century economist. Kate Raworth. Random House Business Books, 2017
URL = https://www.kateraworth.com/ graphic
"Doughnut Economics proposes 7 fundamental shifts needed in today's economic mindset if we – humanity – want to give ourselves half a chance of thriving together on this living planet in the 21st century."

Source Ref  P2P Foundation

Review

George Monbiot:
"We cannot hope to address our predicament without a new worldview. We cannot use the models that caused our crises to solve them. We need to reframe the problem. This is what the most inspiring book published so far this year has done.
In Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist, Kate Raworth of Oxford University’s Environmental Change Institute reminds us that economic growth was not, at first, intended to signify wellbeing. Simon Kuznets, who standardised the measurement of growth, warned: “The welfare of a nation can scarcely be inferred from a measure of national income.” Economic growth, he pointed out, measured only annual flow, rather than stocks of wealth and their distribution.

Raworth points out that economics in the 20th century “lost the desire to articulate its goals”. It aspired to be a science of human behaviour: a science based on a deeply flawed portrait of humanity. The dominant model – “rational economic man”, self-interested, isolated, calculating – says more about the nature of economists than it does about other humans. The loss of an explicit objective allowed the discipline to be captured by a proxy goal: endless growth.
The aim of economic activity, she argues, should be “meeting the needs of all within the means of the planet”. Instead of economies that need to grow, whether or not they make us thrive, we need economies that “make us thrive, whether or not they grow”. This means changing our picture of what the economy is and how it works.
The central image in mainstream economics is the circular flow diagram. It depicts a closed flow of income cycling between households, businesses, banks, government and trade, operating in a social and ecological vacuum. Energy, materials, the natural world, human society, power, the wealth we hold in common … all are missing from the model. The unpaid work of carers – principally women – is ignored, though no economy could function without them. Like rational economic man, this representation of economic activity bears little relationship to reality.
So Raworth begins by redrawing the economy. She embeds it in the Earth’s systems and in society, showing how it depends on the flow of materials and energy, and reminding us that we are more than just workers, consumers and owners of capital.
This recognition of inconvenient realities then leads to her breakthrough: a graphic representation of the world we want to create. Like all the best ideas, her doughnut model seems so simple and obvious that you wonder why you didn’t think of it yourself. But achieving this clarity and concision requires years of thought: a great decluttering of the myths and misrepresentations in which we have been schooled.
The diagram consists of two rings. The inner ring of the doughnut represents a sufficiency of the resources we need to lead a good life: food, clean water, housing, sanitation, energy, education, healthcare, democracy. Anyone living within that ring, in the hole in the middle of the doughnut, is in a state of deprivation. The outer ring of the doughnut consists of the Earth’s environmental limits, beyond which we inflict dangerous levels of climate change, ozone depletion, water pollution, loss of species and other assaults on the living world.
The area between the two rings – the doughnut itself – is the “ecologically safe and socially just space” in which humanity should strive to live. The purpose of economics should be to help us enter that space and stay there.
As well as describing a better world, this model allows us to see, in immediate and comprehensible terms, the state in which we now find ourselves. At the moment we transgress both lines. Billions of people still live in the hole in the middle. We have breached the outer boundary in several places.
An economics that helps us to live within the doughnut would seek to reduce inequalities in wealth and income. Wealth arising from the gifts of nature would be widely shared. Money, markets, taxation and public investment would be designed to conserve and regenerate resources rather than squander them. State-owned banks would invest in projects that transform our relationship with the living world, such as zero-carbon public transport and community energy schemes. New metrics would measure genuine prosperity, rather than the speed with which we degrade our long-term prospects.
Such proposals are familiar; but without a new framework of thought, piecemeal solutions are unlikely to succeed. By rethinking economics from first principles, Raworth allows us to integrate our specific propositions into a coherent programme, and then to measure the extent to which it is realised.
I see her as the John Maynard Keynes of the 21st century: by reframing the economy, she allows us to change our view of who we are, where we stand, and what we want to be.
Now we need to turn her ideas into policy." (https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/apr/12/doughnut-growth-economics-book-economic-model)

More Information

Short video presentations:
Part 1 of six: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mkg2XMTWV4g ; more at https://www.kateraworth.com/animations/

Rosa Luxemburg The Accumulation of Capital (1913)

Blogger Ref/ Transfinancial Economics




First Published: 1913.
Source: (Rare Masterpieces Of Philosophy And Science) The Accumulation of Capital; Edited by Dr. W. Stark, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd; 1951. Printed in Great Britain by Butler and Tanner Limited; Frome and London; Typography by Sean Jennett. No copyright notice.
Translated: (from the German) by Agnes Schwarzschild (Doctor Iuris).
Transcription/Markup: Brian Baggins.
Proofing Status: Chris Clayton (9/2006); Stephen Mikesell (8/2007). Please help by proofing this document (compare it with the original version in PDF) and send in corrections to the archive administrator.
Public Domain: Luxemburg Internet Archive (marxists.org) 2003. You can freely copy, distribute, display and perform this work; as well as make derivative and commercial works. Please credit the Marxists Internet Archive as your source, include the url to this work, and note the transcribers & proofreaders above.

Section One: The Problem of Reproduction
Section Two: Historical Exposition of the Problem
Section Three: the Historical Conditions of Accumulation